Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SASM

SASM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable personal project. ~~No citations since article was created in 2012.~~ Dgpop (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Incorrect--there are two citations in the article, both to books that are reliable sources. ~~Perhaps WP:BEFORE was not done here?~~ Fixed, see below. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 19:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you Mark–fixed above. This was a bad cut & paste on my part. One reference is a tutorial, one lightweight. That this software is actually used and notable remains to be seen. Dgpop (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and fair enough--there may be some verifiable material, but the sources are not enough to establish notability by themselves. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 03:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Two book sources are cited, which is normally sufficient to pass WP:NSOFTWARE. The coverage in one of these seems quite short, but still relatively in-depth as opposed to a mere mention (as evidenced by its having a separate section). Modernponderer (talk) 12:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]