This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Miaumee(talk | contribs) at 04:44, 18 February 2020(Changed the heading "Sources" to "Bibliography". Moved the 2 PlanetMath attribution to the bottom of the page.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 04:44, 18 February 2020 by Miaumee(talk | contribs)(Changed the heading "Sources" to "Bibliography". Moved the 2 PlanetMath attribution to the bottom of the page.)
where is a binomial coefficient; one interpretation of which is the coefficient of the xk term in the expansion of (1 + x)n. There is no restriction on the relative sizes of n and k,[1] since, if n < k the value of the binomial coefficient is zero and the identity remains valid.
Pascal's rule has an intuitive combinatorial meaning, that is clearly expressed in this counting proof.[2]
Proof. Recall that equals the number of subsets with k elements from a set with n elements. Suppose one particular element is uniquely labeled X in a set with n elements.
To construct a subset of k elements containing X, choose X and k-1 elements from the remaining n-1 elements in the set. There are such subsets.
To construct a subset of k elements not containing X, choose k elements from the remaining n-1 elements in the set. There are such subsets.
Every subset of k elements either contains X or not. The total number of subsets with k elements in a set of n elements is the sum of the number of subsets containing X and the number of subsets that do not contain X, .
This equals ; therefore, .
Algebraic proof
Alternatively, the algebraic derivation of the binomial case follows.
Generalization
Pascal's rule can be generalized to multinomial coefficients.[3] For any integer p such that , , and ,
where is the coefficient of the term in the expansion of .
The algebraic derivation for this general case is as follows.[3] Let p be an integer such that , , and . Then