Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage task force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Czar (talk | contribs) at 01:53, 13 January 2020 (Should television episode article titles default to official names over the common name?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconTelevision: Episode coverage Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Archives

Add archive


Old WP:TVE:
  1. 04/04 - 06/07

Old WP:LOE:

  1. August 2005 - April 2006
  2. May 2005 - June 2006
  3. June 2006 - January 2007
  4. Feb 2007 - June 2007
  5. /structure

Current:

  1. 7-12 June 2007
  2. Deletion-related

migrate episode data and references to wikidata

Is it OK to migrate data and references for each episode to wikidata, for example, migrating each episode data from List of One Piece episodes (season 1) to One Piece episode 1, 2, 3, and so in wikidata? This will make it be harder to monitor or watch the changes? As the episode list data will be broken into many items/pages in wikidata. --Ans (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Reassessment of Extreme Spots

Extreme Spots, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parks and Recreation (season 1) Featured Article Review

FAR coordinator User:Casliber has nominated Parks and Recreation (season 1) for a featured article review here. This is a procedural review of its FA status due to the discovery of socking at its original FAC. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. The instructions for the review process are here.

If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Should redirects for the title of every episode of a series by created and placed in the category for those shows' episodes? For example, that was done for New Girl with articles for only a couple episodes but a redirect for all the others, as seen in Category:New Girl episodes. Even for shows that have redirects for some episodes, I usually see them placed in a "Foo episodes redirects to lists" category rather than "Foo episodes" category directly. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I did a bit of work on redefining the refs since the search-engine has been changed.

Does anyone have the time to fix the rest of the refs in that list?

I tried to think of an easy way to "replace" or similar, but need to get on with other stuff today ... Chaosdruid (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should television episode article titles default to official names over the common name?

WT:TV#RfC: Should episode article titles default to the broadcaster's official title? czar 01:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]