Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looking Beyond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:37, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking Beyond

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable public artworkby non notable artist, apparently designed as commercial advertising for a steel company. No sources except listing in a survey. DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure that it's fair to call Faust a non-notable artist. He had a solo exhibition of his work at the Midwest Museum of American Art [1] . This work, however, does not appear to have received any significant coverage. Vexations (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not finding enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks SIGCOV.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.