Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RobLewis8 (talk | contribs) at 21:12, 27 November 2019 (→17:28:52, 27 November 2019 review of draft by RobLewis8). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


November 20

03:17:44, 20 November 2019 review of submission by TopBanana12


TopBanana12 (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TopBanana12, Subjects require notable coverage, that is multiple reliable and independent sources that give the subject significant coverage. This article lacks any such sources, and such sources do not seem to exist. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:26:22, 20 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Helloajnabi



Helloajnabi 08:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC) @Ubiquity: This page is belong to famous motivational writer and I can provide more references for the same. So I am requesting you to please do not delete this page.

08:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Sanjay Sharma08:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

09:38:19, 20 November 2019 review of submission by 194.243.213.83


Can someone help me for the publication of this page .... Vincenzo Ferdinandi was a famous designer in the 60s in Italy. There are also official news and photos attached, but this profile remains a draft. I hope for a welcome help. Thanks anyway.

194.243.213.83 (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some cleanup needs to happen before the page can be published. Reference links to just photos should be removed, as they are not sources. Since many of the sources are just photos, you need some more sources that are actually textual. They can be Italian language, but do need to be reliable and independent of the source. I will also help you resubmit it for re-review. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 22:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:33:25, 20 November 2019 review of submission by DylanFaraci98


DylanFaraci98 (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DylanFaraci98, The article has been rejected as there do not seem to be enough sources in existence to justify an article. I reccomend you turn your efforts to existing articles, such as may be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:53:20, 20 November 2019 review of submission by SM1844


Hello. I've taken your advice and made the suggested edits. How can I resubmit for review? I don't see the resubmission button. Thank you. SM1844 (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SM1844, Your draft has been rejected as it is not notable. I do not see enough improvement, and note that much of the article remains unsourced. I rejected it outright as I do not believe enough sources exist to give this person an article. If you can find more sources and change my mind, do. But I recommend you turn your efforts to improving existing articles about other topics you are interested in. Creating articles from scratch is very difficult, and requires a good grasp of Wikipedia, which can be gained by editing in other areas. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:25:58, 20 November 2019 review of submission by Trannguyent


This draft was rejected recently. I am hoping for some help pinpointing exactly on which section/aspect I should focus my efforts to increase the chances of it being accepted. I recognize some of the formatting mistakes, and I would like to know how I can improve the content. Thank you for any help.

These are the comments left by the reviewer: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Trannguyent (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trannguyent, Wikipedia is not a resume. The content should be presented from a neutral point of view, and like an encyclopedia article. Better sources are also needed. The subjects website, and any sources close to her, should not be used. I also suggest that you read the notability guidelines for academics, which will inform you what information you'll need to prove an article on her is warranted. As is, I do not see how she meets those guidelines. She may still be too early in her career to warrant a page. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:56:46, 20 November 2019 review of draft by MVaughanK


The Widener University School of Law wikipedia page is incorrect and misleading. The Widener University School of Law no longer exists. It split apart in 2015 into Widener University Commonwealth Law School and Widener University Delaware Law School. Since the schools are separate and distinct they should each have their own wikipedia page just like Penn State Law and Penn State Dickinson Law School when they split in 2014. The current Widener University School of Law wikipedia page is confusing to the reader and presents incorrect information. How do I go about creating new wikipedia entries for the two separate law schools? When I submitted the one for Commonwealth Law School it was denied because it said it was a duplicate entry. I would also like to create a new wikipedia page for the Delaware Law School.

MVaughanK (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MVaughanK, I have created the article for you. Please work to clean up the existing Widener University School of Law article to reflect the fact that there is now a distinct article. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 21

08:46:49, 21 November 2019 review of submission by John arneVN


I have added references for this league, as the league season has now finished. John arneVN (talk) 08:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:38:41, 21 November 2019 review of draft by Henrich1992 1992


barcelona_kid 09:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

i need help on this listed article in my sandbox @Henrich1992 1992: Howdy hello! I see that you have deleted the content in your sandbox, you may wish to restore it. I looked at an old version of it, and the issue is you need more sources to show that he is notable. If he has only been covered for being in a Forbes list and getting an award, that is usually not enough. You need to show more concretely why he meets some element of the notability guidelines for people. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:33:17, 21 November 2019 review of draft by 81.44.253.104


Hello,

I tried to publish an entry about a documentary we made about Veganism. It has been declined because they say it seems more like an advertisment than a wikipedia entry. Could you tell me where it appears that way? I would love to rewrite it to wikipedia terms but I'm not sure where it went wrong.

Thank you so much!

81.44.253.104 (talk) 12:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well for starters, you appear to have a conflict of interest here. Please read that link, and disclose any conflicts. Additionally, if you have been paid in any way to write this article, you must disclose that per WP:PAID.
With all the formalities out of the way, heres the nitty-gritty. The narrative section is the ad part. We are an encyclopedia, where facts are presented neutrally. That section needs to be re-written or broken into parts, should not use promotional language, and read formally. You may wish to look at March of the Penguins for an example of how to properly write and format an article about a documentary.
Please also read referencing for beginners about how to properly use and format references. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:18:52, 21 November 2019 review of submission by Tony lee southside RingaT


Tony lee southside RingaT (talk) 14:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tony lee southside RingaT, Writing an autobiography is strongly discouraged. Furthermore, any article must be supported by reliable sources. 3 good sources is a minimum, think newspapers, books, magazines, media outlets, that sort of thing. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:06, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:33:00, 21 November 2019 review of submission by Storm1492

My article was declined because it isn't "sufficiently notable for inclusion". It's an article about a book, if admittedly not very detailed yet. How exactly is it not sufficiently notable? It has references and everything. Storm1492 (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Storm1492, Howdy hello! We can't cover just anything on Wikipedia, and that's why we have a set of notability guidelines. For books, that generally means you need 3 reviews in reliable sources, or to have made a best seller list. If you can prove that this book meets those requirements, please do, and resubmit it. If not, alas we cannot cover it, but I invite you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Books, where you can contribute to other cool articles about books. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:47:01, 21 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Khecken


Our company Zomaron has recently rebranded to Paystone. I tried to update our Zomaron Wikipedia article to rename to Paystone or "move" to Paystone, however, I was not able to do this because I am not an autoconfirmed user so I do not have the "move" option when I edit. Instead, I submitted a new article for Paystone and it was not accepted. Instead, they said that it should be added to the Zomaron article and the Zomaron article should be renamed or moved. Could you please advise me on how to do this since I do not have the permissions? Can I provide proof of my title at the company or can I submit a ticket to have to moved to Paystone?

Khecken (talk) 18:47, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khecken, For starters, you need to read our conflict of interest and paid editing guidelines. In short: you are being paid, even if not directly, to make these edits. You must disclose that fact by following the steps at WP:PAID.
If the company has changed its name, we need news coverage of that. Otherwise, we can't report it because it isn't verifiable. If you can find such evidence, then leave a note on the Zomaron talk page asking for the change to be made. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:20:05, 21 November 2019 review of submission by Howenstein115

Article was rejected even after I added 3 neutral sources. By "neutral", that is not affiliated with the company. If this is not good enough, then I'd say the following articles should also have been rejected: Hammer Bowling, Track International, and Columbia Industries. I modeled the Storm Products article after these, and they have much fewer (or no) neutral citations than mine. Howenstein115 (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a passing by note that those three articles are very poorly sourced even with the recent additions, and I they wouldn't be likely to pass an AfC/AfD today with just those. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 20:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:07:40, 21 November 2019 review of submission by Bberk1201


I don't know what else to add. This page is for someone I know and they asked me to put it up, thats all the info we are going to post about him. Let me know if there is something I can do to get this published.

Bberk1201 (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 22

04:13:28, 22 November 2019 review of draft by 2604:2000:80C2:1000:534:A1E0:7C91:E07D


I'm unclear as to why my edits were declined. The sources that I cited for the Mei Messaging article were Wikipedia itself, which, to my understanding, is a verifiable source. Can someone kindly clarify?

2604:2000:80C2:1000:534:A1E0:7C91:E07D (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think what the reviewer meant is that wikis are not reliable sources, i.e. yourdictionary.com. They fall under user-generated content and thus are inherently unreliable. By the way, Wikipedia itself is similarly unusable, although for slightly different reason.
In any case, you need multiple in-depth sources, not just dictionary entries. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 14:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:38:23, 22 November 2019 review of submission by Melofors

Hey, there. This draft is undeniably notable with many notable sources from gaming sites and even from mainstream media such as The Independent and Newsweek, as well as a Pearson Education-published article. This by itself should be enough to convince someone that the topic is notable. On top of that, I believe that the draft is well-written and structured. As Hellknowz said, "At worst, the draft should have been declined with ample explanation of why multiple independent in-depth sources about the subject that are vetted at WP:VG/RS are not sufficient for GNG or how the topic at large is contrary to Wikipedia's purpose." Please consider my request, and thank you in advance. -Melofors (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the admin who protected the page in the mainspace so this can be sorted out. This was a horrific rejection of a draft that met WP:GNG (with a clear need of expansion but WP:NORUSH), maybe one of the worst ones I have seen. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:30:02, 22 November 2019 review of submission by LoveLearning55

Ok so I published my draft for the page Dyslexia Gold and it got declined on the basis of no independent sources. But I would have assumed that bdadyslexia.org.uk/shop/assured/dyslexia-gold is an independent source of Dyslexia Gold. What makes this non- independent? LoveLearning55 (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is just an advert for Dyslexia Gold on the The British Dyslexia Association website. Theroadislong (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's an advert. It's BDA Assured which according to the BDA means "Assured products we believe are effective at identifying or supporting dyslexia if used as intended, developed from generally accepted and well-established science, and make marketing claims that accurately reflect what a user can expect – based on the evidence provided to us." so the BDA must have looked at evidence from Dyslexia Gold and said all the claims they make are backed up. --82.36.137.106 (talk) 14:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Dyslexia Gold’s unique online programs develop the skills needed for reading. Based on the latest research, our structured programs improve phonological awareness and eye tracking" is absolutely an advert it's written by Dyslexia Gold and cannot be construed as an in-depth independent source. Theroadislong (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


November 23

00:26:43, 23 November 2019 review of submission by PapayaWiki105


Hi -

As it relates to my previous question, by "We" I meant "QC Entertainment", the company. I work for Ray Mansfield, Sean McKittrick, and Ted Hamm.

Look forward to hearing what I can do to get the page approved.

PapayaWiki105 (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PapayaWiki105, Howdy hello! Soo: you appear to have a conflict of interest here. You must disclose if you've been paid to make these edits in anyway, by following the steps at WP:PAID. Do that, and then we can talk further.Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

00:34:44, 23 November 2019 review of submission by Ashtronautz

I want to understand how to publish my wiki page, either getting to learn better citations, references, etc. Ashtronautz (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ashtronautz, Howdy hello! So here's the issue: this article is unlikely to be published at all, as the subject isn't notable. I.e., there is not suitable coverage of the subject. Usually, at least 3 reliable and independent sources are needed, such as articles in the media. But this seems to be about just an average person, like you or I. We don't write articles about anyone, just those folks who have had significant coverage in published sources. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:05:46, 23 November 2019 review of submission by Anne Delong


Bobby Watson (musician)

I drafted the above page some time ago, and, because it's about a person I know well, I submitted it to AfC for neutral review. It was recently accepted, but I noticed that a request for a photograph was added. Another long-time friend of the subject has taken many pictures of him over the years, and at my request he's now uploaded two of these to Commons; a closeup:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bobby_Watson_with_his_Stratocaster.jpg

and a picture of one of the bands he was in early in his career:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bacon_Fat_in_1973_at_Trent_University.jpg

However, we both have a conflict of interest and shouldn't add to the article now that it's in mainspace, so I am asking for a reviewer to look at the images and decide if they are appropriate.

—Anne Delong (talk) 04:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:22:46, 23 November 2019 review of submission by 108.247.107.100

This is part of a National DAR Service Project to write a Wikimedia article about our DAR Revolutionary War Patriot. I followed instructions provided by our National Board....I am extremely disappointed at the response that a man who served for the freedom of our Country was not deemed to be "notable". I would like this to be reviewed.

108.247.107.100 (talk) 04:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GrandmaOfTwo. Thank you for your interest in improving Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the encyclopedia's requirements may not have been accurately transmitted from Wikipedia, through the Daughters of the American Revolution, to you. Few people who fought for freedom are notable (meet Wikipedia's criteria for a stand-alone article); probably fewer than one in a thousand. Primary sources, such as those available through Fold3, do not demonstrate notability. To show notability, one needs significant coverage in secondary sources, such as history books written by historians and published by academic presses.
Creating a new Wikipedia article is one of the most difficult, time consuming, and frustrating tasks a novice editor can attempt. Instead, try improving existing articles. Heman Swift and Return J. Meigs Sr., for example, have been assessed as lowest quality and "C" quality respectively, so there is much room for improvement. You also may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject United States History. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:04:43, 23 November 2019 review of draft by Brett125


Brett125 (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create a Bio-stub for "Wilmot Max Ramsay, Jamaican American politician and Civil Rights leader"? Thanks.

Hi Brett125. This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. To request that an article be written, consider asking at Wikipedia:Requested articles. You will need to show that the topic is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Articles must be about notable topics: those that have received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. We have a fairly precise definition of what is considered a "reliable source", as well as detailed inclusion guidelines. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:17:45, 23 November 2019 review of submission by Claudette De Ville

Hello and thanks for your advice. I am going to adapt the page accordingly. As for the references, there are photographs of some of the articles on the site www.pol-fraiture.be. I spent many days at the National Library (Belgium)looking for other articles. Most of them are in French... only few in English. Pol died in 1981 and the Internet was not what it is today... newspapers were not on the net. May I ask you to help me find my draft? Thanks in advance. Claudette De Ville Claudette De Ville (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:35:39, 23 November 2019 review of draft by Ivor Speedwell


I have reworked the article I submitted, 'Reginald Paul', to include source references where possible and to make minor changes to the text. This revised version is in my sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ivor_Speedwell/sandbox. Is there anything else I need to do to get this version of the article reviewed and / or published ?

Ivor Speedwell (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivor Speedwell. When a draft is declined (Draft:Reginald Paul), do not create a new version of it in a different location (User:Ivor Speedwell/sandbox). Simply edit the declined draft, below the decline notice and reviewer comments. Then, when you are ready, use the blue "Resubmit" button on the draft to request a review of the revised version. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:30:21, 23 November 2019 review of submission by Balusingh


Balusingh (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Balusingh (talk) 20:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Balusingh: Do you have a specific question about this? The decline and reject reasons link to the pages that explain in detail what sources are needed. You resubmitted the draft for re-review without adding any new sources. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 12:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:13:03, 23 November 2019 review of submission by 71.145.217.237


The article on Weyl Semimetals is in urgent need of work with several popular science articles referencing them. The page meanders, is too complex for laypersons to comprehend and references too many technical terms that lack links out of context

I left my thoughts in their talk page but I thought they might get more visibility here.

A variation of the articles referencing it is here: https://www.livescience.com/axion-found-in-weyl-semimetal.html

71.145.217.237 (talk) 21:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was accepted for publication five years ago, so it is long out of scope of Articles for Creation. Posting here is unlikely to have the effect you desire. Talk:Weyl semimetal is the correct place to discuss the article. See Help:Talk pages for conventions, especially regarding where to place threads, how to sign posts, and how to notify others. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 24

00:22:04, 24 November 2019 review of draft by E-Stylus


Thank you for reviewing the above draft. My paid contribution disclosure is noted on the talk page. I'm requesting a re-review as the draft content appears to meet WP:NPOV and is supported by independent, reliable, published sources per WP:NCORP guidelines. Any feedback would be appreciated. E-Stylus (talk) 00:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

E-Stylus, DGG has reviewed it as PR and advertising content. You would do well to follow his sage advice that he left on the draft. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CaptainEek - Thank you for your response. Per my recent comment on the draft page, the feedback appears inconsistent with site guidelines. In turn, would another editor be willing to re-review the original draft independent of the initial review? E-Stylus (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
E-Stylus, You can re-submit it for review, and wait for it to go through the queue. But if you don't make any improvements, its likely it will get denied again. But as another reviewer, I would have given very similar feedback to DGG's. I see the same issues. Its been WP:REFBOMBED, its notability is still borderline, and its overly promotional. This is an article that feels too good to be true. I would recommend you stand back and remember that articles must be neutral not only in wording but in presentation. This article paints the company in a glowing light, as if they're perfect and have done so many good things. But lets remember: its just a company. We, as Wikipedia, aren't in the business of promoting anything. We merely note that companies exist, and note the good and the bad about them. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 23:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:09:53, 24 November 2019 review of submission by Splashcordarticles

This is mainly my first time making an Article, and I wanted to start off small with someone I did not really know but did my full research on.

I do think this person (InScane) is Notable in some way for his actions to the public like his amazing and wonderful support to the people, and his passion to helping and supporting kids/children around the world.

If you have any advice on how I can continue working on this article, and/or what to do and how I could get this article approved. Splash Articles 06:09, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

@Splashcordarticles: A youtuber with only 3k subs is just an average person. No special reason for them to have a Wikipedia page. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:53:03, 24 November 2019 review of submission by Rishiviswakarma

can I link youtube videos of that person as a reference? Rishiviswakarma (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rishiviswakarma: Normally, no. There are a few exceptions, but they aren't likely to apply here. However, if you mean whether such a source would count for the draft to be accepted (i.e. pass notability criteria), then definitely no. We need independent sources. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 12:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:01:58, 24 November 2019 review of submission by CraigMc1979

Updated intro to reflect that the Person in question was the First Nigerian to hold a PHD in computer science and the one who then created the subject formally in Nigeria's universities. This later lead to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenike_Osofisan Updated citation to validate awards as per that mentioned by the reviewer. Looking for any additional feedback on how to improve the article for submission.

CraigMc1979 (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CraigMc1979. All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is a living person. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong. Wikipedia, because it is user-generated, is not a reliable source. The only other source the draft cites is a press release from the Nigeria Computer Society (NCS). It supports very little of the content of the draft. It is a reliable source for the fact that Odeyemi was given an award in a ceremony organized by the NCS, but it doesn't demonstrate that the award is significant or that Odeyemi is notable. Searches of Google Books and Google News found no sources that would prove notability. Absent such sources, I agree with the reviewer, the topic is not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:03:07, 24 November 2019 review of submission by Ankii luthra


Ankii luthra (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ankii luthra, You misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. We are not a dating app or a place to find friends or advertise yourself. We are an encyclopedia which hosts factual and notable content. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:55, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:04:35, 24 November 2019 review of submission by Bongshomoy


Listvl255 16:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft deleted, user sock blocked.Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:29:17, 24 November 2019 review of draft by 193.136.124.131

I don't understand the motive of the submissions's rejection. Katya Scheinberg, another applied mathematician, has a wiki page. The relevance and impact of Scheinberg's and Vicentes's contributions are similar. In fact both researchers were recipients of the Lagrange's Prize for the same book (they are co-authors of the work).

Can you help pointing the changes that are requested, in order for the re-submission to be accepted? Thank you very much for all your time.

193.136.124.131 (talk) 17:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy hello! This professor is likely notable if they hold a named chair. However, you need references that support the claims made. You currently have no references. Please see referencing for beginners. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:30:37, 24 November 2019 review of draft by NantucketHistory


I have put a lot of work into this article and I am requesting help as I do not know what needs to be done to actually have this become an article & not just a draft. I believe the recent reviewer had some correct commentary, which have now been addressed, but that some commentry was subjective. I really need help!

NantucketHistory (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NantucketHistory. If you believe you've addressed the reviewer's concerns, you may click the blue "Resubmit" button on the draft to have it re-evaluated. It's likely that it will be reviewed by a different reviewer, who may have different strengths, and point out different problems. Submission and review is an iterative process. Many aspects of the draft are good, and the next reviewer may decide that any remaining problems are best fixed in mainspace. Expect the page to be edited mercilessly. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 25

08:28:37, 25 November 2019 review of submission by RanaJapan


RanaJapan (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:08, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Aliso4ka2013

Hello! Why my article has been rejected? I added more trustful references and did't understand the comment that it's a promotional page. What I can do for improve my article? Thank you! Aliso4ka2013 (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:15:54, 25 November 2019 review of submission by DiplomatTesterMan

A user messed up the draft and removed cites after which the draft was rejected it. I didn't see this in time. Please could the article be reviewed again; i have manually reverted it back to what it was. If it still bad and doesnt pass AFC then nevermind. Thanks. DTM (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC) DTM (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:26:37, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Mirjami Kuusela


Mirjami Kuusela (talk) 12:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:28:43, 25 November 2019 review of submission by MarcoLaudato

Hello :)

I have amended the draft according to the reviews. In particular I have added two secondary sources (from European Mathematical Society) and I have removed the mission statement section. Moreover, I have eliminated all the external links in the draft body. Please, let me know if now it is acceptable!

Kind regards, Marco


MarcoLaudato (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


17:33:33, 25 November 2019 review of draft by Tonyswan18


Hi, Today I got message that my substitution was declined due to lack of reliable sources. I tried to support all facts that I used in my article. But if it's not enough, could you please give me to know what exactly parts of my article I need to support by reliable sources? I hope it will help to improve my draft. Thank you, Tony Tonyswan18 (talk) 17:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:34:43, 25 November 2019 review of submission by TDuVal

This is not a press release. It is an article on a company of interest that includes the history of the creation of a patent-pending system. This is notable, as evidenced by the articles in 401(k) Specialist Magazine, Entrepreneur, Forbes, etc. This article is similar in tone and construction to the article on Acorns, which is in the same industry. I would welcome constructive advice on how to make the article more befitting for inclusion in Wikipedia. TDuVal (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


21:06:01, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Jeremiah Editorial Lee


This is a major landmark and tourist destination in Helsinki, Finland. Smaller Ferris wheels are listed on List of Ferris wheels

Jeremiah Editorial Lee (talk) 21:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeremiah Editorial Lee: The rejection reason provides a link to the relevant guideline. None of the sources in the draft meet the requirement set out by WP:GNG. Wikipedia articles are not based on popularity, but in-depth sourcing. Similarly, articles are not created based on other articles, but only on their own sources. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 21:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:44:12, 25 November 2019 review of submission by JohnGabrielRulz


I want my submission to be reconsidered. I'd like this entry to be part wedding reception gift for my good friend, next January. After that it can be denied or taken down. I'd appreciate your help on this matter.

Thank you,

D.R. JohnGabrielRulz (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't what Wikipedia is for. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:09:50, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Jeremiah Editorial Lee


I have added media coverage from Sweden, the UK, and the United States about the opening of this landmark. It is a symbol for Helsinki. Search for Helsinki skyline and you will see so.

Jeremiah Editorial Lee (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted based on additional references provided. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:49:47, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Wikiabc123wiki


I have asked for a re-review but have not received one for a long time, and the page is still waiting for the re-review. The rejection of the publication was due to the absence of citations, and as can be seen, many notable sources have been added for every fact stated. Thank you and hoping to receive a re-review soon! Wikiabc123wiki (talk) 22:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:55:54, 25 November 2019 review of submission by Wikiabc123wiki

Hello! I wrote a short article on the Inan Family of Turkey ( a very wealthy family associated with construction and real estate as their business) and it has been rejected due to the absence of sources. I have added many notable sources now, but have not recieved a re-review for a long time and still did not have one. Could you please make sure it gets re-reviewed as the family's company is one of the biggest construction companies in Turkey. Thank you very much! Wikiabc123wiki (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


November 26

02:14:29, 26 November 2019 review of submission by Glendon wasey


I am a fan of Michael Stokes' work, and I thought he should have a photo on his Wikipedia entry, so I emailed him through his website to ask permission to upload a photo I found on the internet to his Wiki page. He said yes. Upon uploading, I was asked if I owned the copyright to the photo. I said no but that Mr. Stokes had given me permission to use it. This evidently led to the belief that Mr. Stokes and I have a personal relationship. We do not. He and I have never met. I simply emailed him to ask permission. I notice the photo has been taken down, which is fine. I feel bad that his page was flagged and I would like to ask that the "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject" flag be removed since it is not true.

Glendon wasey (talk) 02:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:04:49, 26 November 2019 review of submission by Lnkph21


Please re-review this article. I have added multiple secondary references, displaying that the local wrestling promotion has been making waves in the Philippines with its wrestling shows.

Lnkph21 (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A good chunk of your references are blogs, which are unreliable. This does not meet WP:PWPROM. JTP (talk • contribs) 15:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:16:18, 26 November 2019 review of submission by 94.74.228.98

How are other companies "sufficiently notable" for Wikipedia when this one isn't?

If you look just at the companies within the same industry... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MemoQ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartcat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartling

I do not understand how Memsource is not notable enough but these are.

Thanks for your explanation.

94.74.228.98 (talk) 10:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@94.74.228.98:, firstly, the presence (or indeed, absence) of another article on wikipedia doesn't mean this article should be included or deleted. This essay gives a good overview of why this is the case. It's certainly possible that one or more of these other articles also doesn't meet notability requirements and should be nominated for deletion at Articles for Deletion.
I did, however, take a brief look at the three - MemoQ and Smartling both have at least a couple of good sources, whether that be reviews in reliable sources or more general consideration. Smartcat is much more of an edge case, but amongst a number of unhelpful sources, there is at least some reliable coverage.
Please remember that companies and products have a higher notability requirement than most wikipedia articles. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:05:57, 26 November 2019 review of draft by 96.231.61.168


Hi there I am trying to understand why this article keeps getting declined.. I have used other references on Wikipedia to make sure it aligns to existing standards... Also have put in indepdent links from government resrouces that support the article? What else do I need?

I included references to other articles as well that are comparable.. please advise? am I missing something?

96.231.61.168 (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:58:40, 26 November 2019 review of submission by Frakes928


I have added the third resource for general credibility. I believe this is my 10th edit. Someone please review and let me know what I need to do to get this posted. Been trying since August 24th. Thank you! Frakes928 (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Frakes928: Please read WP:NMUSICBIO to understand the inclusion criteria that we use. See als WP:DECLINED. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 27

04:31:51, 27 November 2019 review of submission by Georgy Panicker

The updated person is very popular and it is notable person in wiki.Kindly review the submission

Georgy Panicker (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:10:01, 27 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Georgi D



Georgi D (talk) 08:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:03:38, 27 November 2019 review of submission by Srinivasveedepu

Hi,Please review suggest if there is anything i can add for approval Srinivasveedepu (talk) 09:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:13:58, 27 November 2019 review of submission by Srinivasveedepu


Srinivasveedepu (talk) 09:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:58:45, 27 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by 36.79.252.143



Why submission rejected? 36.79.252.143 (talk) 09:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:52:15, 27 November 2019 review of draft by Tiagress


Hello, I wanted some help please as a newbie! Please could I kindly ask why this doesn't meet the criteria for significant coverage? The four last references attached the wiki entry are specifically by third parties (including TomsHardware - a reputable site) on the subject matter: Userbenchmark. Should I include more references indicating the same? Thank you so much for your time!

Tiagress (talk) 11:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:52:50, 27 November 2019 review of submission by Susana Furphy

I think I can improve my autobiography. I can mention all the books where I have been published including the anthologies where I have participated. Also collaborations in Journals as a writer and reviewer. Also, I can include the books I have edited because I am the only editor of the company. Does it work?

Extended content

Didáctica y semántica Propuesta de una didáctica sorjuaniana para la enseñanza de español como lengua extranjera o como segunda lengua VII Encuentro de profesores de lenguas CELE, UNAM UNAM, México, D.F. 1992

968-36-3856-2 Lexicología Hacia la elaboración de un diccionario de la obra de Sor Juana Expolingua Habana’92, 1er Congreso Internacional de Lenguas y Culturas La Habana, Cuba 1992 Poesía. Estudios y crítica Aplicación de la lingüística computacional al Primero Sueño de Sor Juana Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey -CEM México, D.F. 1993 9709129708 Poesía. Estudios y crítica El Primero Sueño de Sor Juana: estudio semántico y retórico UNAM (Cuadernos del Seminario de Poética, 16) Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas (UNAM) / Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey -CEM México, D.F. 1993 9683634133

Léxico y dialectología Enseñanza de vocabulario a partir de un estudio dialectológico Congreso Internacional de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de América Latina (ALFAL) Veracruz, México 1993 Lexicología y semántica Investigación dialectológica con base semántica Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de El Español de América. Tomo I. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago de Chile, Chile (1992) 1995

956-14-03888-9 Léxico Índice de Mexicanismos (Colaboradora) Academia Mexicana de la Lengua. Secretaría de Educación Pública México, D.F. 1997 Literatura El poema Primero Sueño Sor Juana y su mundo: una mirada actual. Memorias del Congreso Internacional Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana. Fondo de Cultura Económica México, D. F. 1998 9681658817 Retórica y pragmática El discurso político: leyes, argumentación lógica, presupuestos y sobreentendidos Primer Congreso Internacional de Retórica en México México, D.F. 1998 968-36-6749-X Semiótica Tecnología groupware en la enseñanza de la semiótica Actas del 7º Congreso internacional de la Asociación de Estudios Semióticos Dresden, Alemania 1999 Literatura Triángulo: un texto, tres perspectivas (coautora) X Conferencia Lingüístico-Literaria Santiago de Cuba, Cuba 2000 ISSN: 0048-9115 Semántica El campo semántico del movimiento Actas del 5º Congreso del Español de América Burgos, España (1995) 2001 CD: ISBN: 84-699-4035-X Ensayo De lo que está hecha la memoria (redacción y corrección de estilo) Miguel Ángel Porrúa México, D.F. 2001 9707011556 Ensayo. Estudios y crítica Que nadie sepa mi sufrir. Este (no) es un libro de Semiótica Miguel Ángel Porrúa / Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey- CEM México, D. F. 2004 9707014563 Semiótica El cine de Kieslowski desde las categorías de signo de Peirce Actas del 8º Congreso de la Asociación Internacional de Semiótica Lyon, Francia 2004 Literatura Numerología en el Primero Sueño Memorias del Segundo Congreso Internacional: Aproximaciones a Sor Juana. Universidad Claustro de Sor Juana. F. C. E. México, D.F. 2005 9687631102 Ensayo Reglas de abreviatura en el diario de un monje español en Australia (Coautora) Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research (JILAR) Volumen 15, Number 1 Australia 2009 1864465786 Ensayo Appendix A: Documents Pertaining to the Dispute between Father Villalpando and Father Prado. (Coautora) Pp. 573-78 Edwin Mellen Juan Bautista Villalpando and the Nature and Science of Architectural Drawing. Tessa Morrison. In Nexus Network Journal. April 2010, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 63-73 New York 2009 Print: 15905896 Online: 15224600 Tesis (doctorado UNAM) Una lectura al Primero Sueño de Sor Juana Edición Digital Alicante. Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes Alicante, España 2012 Studies CDU: 821.134.2 Narrativa. Cuento 20 figuraciones y una fantasía desesperada Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2013 9786079598839 Ensayo Las diez clases del signo de Pierce en el cine de Kieslowski y la globalización Semiosis, Tercera época Vol. XI, núm 21. Instituto de Investigaciones Lingüístico-Literarias Universidad Veracruzana Veracruz, México Enero- junio de 2015 ISSN: 01879316 Narrativa. Novela Rostro Borroso Ápeiron Ediciones Madrid 2018 9788417182724 Narrativa. Cuento Emilio. In Memóriam (Coautora) Grupo Editorial Benma Ciudad de México 2019 9786079494247

Participation in anthologies: “Modelo”, “Buenas noches”, “Lengua”, “Escritora” Antología 20017 de poesía y narrativa breve “escritura sin frontera” Tomo 2 Omar Darío Ruiz Raíz Alternativa Buenos Aires, Argentina 2007 Depósito legal: 11.723 “El que se va y el que se queda”, “La lluvia”, “Lo que pasa”, “Puesta de sol” Treinta poéticas Leo Zelada Lord Byron Ediciones Madrid 2008 Depósito legal: 2008-04592 “Botas” Caminando entre sueños Gabriela Gammarota Andrónico Temperley, Buenos Aires 2008 9789872259389 “Sarrià” Voltant per Catalunya I Mèxic (L’art a la motxilla) Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2008 “Las hormigas” Pecadillos, sueños y Humo. Narrativa Plural & Singular Blanca Mart Associació d’Escriptors Tirant lo Blanc de Catalunya Barcelona 2009 9788461362486 “Marinero” Agua Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, DF 2009 “Palomas” Aire Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, DF 2009 “Porque te amo”, “Del mar y sus peligros” “He de fingir”, “Agonía al verte”, “El Sueño”, “Esta tarde, mi bien”, “Retórica del llanto”, “Sobre los gozos”, “Tu voz hiere mis oídos”, “Juana” Visiones conjuntas Laura Castanedo Terra dell’Arte, UNEAC Baja California, México y La Habana, Cuba 2010 “Sam” Fugo Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, DF 2010 “Julia” Independencia Revolución Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, DF 2010 “El que se va y el que se queda” Maratón de escritores Enrique Gracia y Emilio Porta Netwriters Madrid 2011 9788499839646 “Remiendo” La Vista Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, DF 2011 “Silencio” El oído Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, DF 2011 Todo sobre el olor El olor Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2011 “Ella se llamaba Laura” Raíces Latinas Hemil García Linares Vagón Azul Editores Perú 2012 9786124603013 “Éxito 13” El gusto Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2012 “El toro” El tacto Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2012 “Milagro” La otra historia clínica Herlinda Dabbah Palabras y Plumas Editores México, D.F. 2012 9786079585600 “Ratas” Miedo Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2013 “Los anteojos” Mujer Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2014 “Cane Toad” Ficciones Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2015 “Gitano” Humor Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2016 “Vuelo” Humor Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2016 “Gitano” Tiempo Blanca Mart Asociación de Escritores Tirant lo Blanc México, D.F. 2016 “Cane Toad” 1818:Aventura Antología de ciencia ficción hispano-mexicana Mario Martínez, Blanca Mart y Tony Jim CPSIA U. S. A. 2018 9781720819257

Prologs:

Doce afectos Martha Vázquez Lacroix (comp.) Prólogo Plaza y Valdés Editores México, DF 2005 9707224444 Voces con vida Antología de varios autores Coautora del prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Palabras y Plumas Editores México, D.F. 2009 9786079519506 Entre gozos y rebozos Antología de varios autores Coautora del prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Palabras y Plumas Editores México, D.F. 2010 9786079519520 Primavera Antología de varios autores Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serial Estaciones I México, D.F. 2011 9786079574826 Verano Antología de varios autores Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serial Estaciones II México, D.F. 2011 9786079574833 Besos de limón Ángel Hernández Barrera Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2011 9786079574802 Desechos tóxicos Ruth Reséndiz Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2011 9786079574819

Voces en papel Soraya García Sánchez Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Ediciones Idea España 2011 9788499415505 Otoño Antología de varios autores Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serial Estaciones III México, D.F. 2012 9786079574864 Invierno Antología de varios autores Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serial Estaciones IV México, D.F. 2012 9786079574871 Voces con vida Antología de varios autores Prólogo y nota en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma (Concurso Internacional) México, D.F. 2012 9786079574888

La Serenissima Alicia Rebolledo Prólogo Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2013 9786079598815 Estrategia Ñ: Guía completa de preparación para exámenes de certificación de Español como Lengua Extranjera (E/LE) Martha Jurado Salinas y Arturo Mendoza Ramos Comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2013 9786079574895 Brujas a través del tiempo Alicia Karlsson Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2013 978607959883 Cada loco con su tema Antología de diversos autores Introducción y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma (Concurso Internacional) México, D.F. 2013 9786079598860 Lujuria Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Pecados I México, D.F. 2013 9786079598822 Pereza Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serial Pecados II México, D.F. 2013 9786079598846 Polvo de oro Sonia Elhers Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2014 9786079647421 Sorpresas Antonio Valiente Barderas Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2014 9786079598884 Ciertamente la vida Lissete López Bidopia Prólogo Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2014 9786079647445 Gula Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Pecados III México, D.F. 2014 9786079598877 Ira Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Pecados IV México, D.F. 2014 9786079598891 Envidia Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Pecados V México, D.F. 2014 9786079647438 La sombra de las cosas amadas Jorge Pacheco Zavala Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2015 9786079647469 La Lujuria del Gourmet Carlos Bracho Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2015 9786079683214 El lado oscuro de la pluma M. Guadalupe Castillejos Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2015 9786079683221 Soberbia Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Pecados VI México, D.F. 2015 9786079647476 Avaricia Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Pecados VII México, D.F. 2015 9786079683207 Vida/Muerte Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Trilogías: Primera Dicotomía México, D.F. 2015 9786079683252 Algo que contar Michelle Hernández Arganis Comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2016 9786079683276 Muerte en la azotea Carlos Bracho Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2016 9786079683290 Amor/Odio Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Trilogías: Segunda Dicotomía México, D.F. 2016 9786079494032 Predicar la verdad. Buscando la otredad Lluís Moya Sala Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2016 9786079494049 ¡Apaga la tele y enciende la mente! Elizabeth Vázquez Guerrero Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2016 9786079494001 Los hijos de la marimba Sonia Elhers Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2016 9786079494025 El espejo del emir Josemil Garmendia Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2016 9786079494049 Paz/Guerra Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Serie Trilogías: Tercera Dicotomía México, D.F. 2017 9786079494070 Ahora, todos… ¡a cocinar! Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2017 9786079494100 Para un mundo mejor Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2017 9786079494148 Todos somos inmigrantes Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma (Concurso internacional) México, D.F. 2017 9786079494162 Variaciones sobre lo trágico. La crisis del drama Alberto Navarro Fuentes Comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2017 9786079494063 Festín inacabable Carlos Bracho Comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2017 9786079494063 Nacidos de la Sal Rafael Villa Sandoval Preámbulo Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2017 9786079494087 Tierras felices y otros cuentos Celia Kaminesky Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2017 97860794940904 Conocimiento de sí: una aproximación desde la filosofía, la psicología y la estética. Judith Ruiz-Godoy y otros Comentario en cuarta de forros Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey y Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2018 9786075014807 9786079494117 Mujer pájaro Alicia Rebolledo Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2018 9786079494155 A contracorriente, más allá de las elecciones Arturo Martínez Cáceres Prólogo Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2018 9786079494179 Sueños de amor Carlos Bracho Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma México, D.F. 2018 9786079494186 Cuentos de misterio, suspenso y horror Antología de diversos autores Prólogo y comentario en cuarta de forros Grupo Editorial Benma Ciudad de México 2019 9786079494223

Collaborations online: Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, transmisora de lo popular México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n30/sarroyo.html

Numerología en el Primero Sueño México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n34/sarroyo.html

Introducción al número especial Vinculación de la Semiótica y la Informática (Coordinado por Charo Lacalle y Susana Arroyo) México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n38/intro.html

Semiótica e Informática: una nueva alianza México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n38/index.html

Por una pedagogía de la Informática México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n38/rdorra.html

Verba volant, Scripta Manent México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n50/sarroyo.html

Misión Civilizadora de un Monje Español en Australia (Roberto Esposto y Susana Arroyo-Furphy) México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n55/arroyoesposto.html

Un atardecer australiano (fotografía) México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n48/sarroyo.html

La cortesía. Un fenómeno pragmático (Isolda Rojas-Lizana y Susana Arroyo-Furphy) México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/anteriores/n48/sarroyo.html

Quisiera hablar de La Nimiedad México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/ene15.html

Quisiera hablar de la película Babel México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/feb1.html

Quisiera hablar de la película Apocalypto México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/feb28.html

Quisiera hablar del Manual para aprender Náhuatl México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/mar15.html

Quisiera hablar de The Departed México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/abril.html


Quisiera hablar de Autores Judeoconversos de la Ciudad de México México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/abr23.html


Quisiera hablar de Das Leben Der Anderen México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/may14.html

Quisiera hablar de La ciencia del sueño México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/jun4.html

Quisiera hablar de Cuatro minutos México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/agosto.html

Quisiera hablar del Diario de un loco enfermo de cordura México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2007/sep15.html

Quisiera hablar de La poética de lo incierto, de Marcia Espinoza-Vera México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/ene14.html

Quisiera hablar de El amor en los tiempos del cólera México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/ene20.html

Quisiera hablar de la película The Lark Farm México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/ene20b.html

Quisiera hablar de Doce Afectos. Martha Vázquez Lacroix, comp. México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/ene20c.html

Quisiera hablar de la película Le Scaphandre et le Papillon México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/abr28.html

Una mexicana en defensa del Catalán o Los mil un años de la lengua española México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/jul07.html

Silencio de Susana Furphy México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/ago23.html

Quisiera hablar de la película Il y a longtemps que je t’aime o Kristin Scott Thomas, una actriz de 40 quilates México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2008/dic08.html

Quisiera hablar de… El extraño caso de Benjamin Button, o mucho ruido y pocas nueces México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/ene19.html

Quisiera hablar de… Revolutionary Road, Sam Mendes México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/feb23.html

Quisiera hablar de Slumdog Millionaire, Danny Boyle México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/mar26.html

Quisiera hablar de Live-Flesh de Santiago Fouz-Hernández y Alfredo Martínez-Expósito México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/mar06.html

Quisiera hablar de Le premier jour du rest de ta vie, de Rémi Bezançon México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/jul6.html

Quisiera hablar de Constelación de Sueños, de Marisa Iturriaga México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/jul27.html

Quisiera hablar de… El Premio Tirant lo Blanc México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/AGO17.html

Quisiera hablar de… la poesía de Bob Gurney, Carmen Comas y Teresa Domingo Català México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2009/sept3.html

Quisiera hablar de… 500 Days of Summer from Marc Webb México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2010/cyl10_500daysummer.html

Quisiera hablar de… Alejandro Amenábar and Ágora México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2010/cyl_Amenabaryagora.html

Quisiera hablar de… La imperturbabilidad del cine anglosajón México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2010/cyl_cineanglo.html

Quisiera hablar de… Black Swan o ya no hay amor en el cine. México. Razón y Palabra. http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2011/cyl_blackswan.html

Quisiera hablar de… Cuentos cínicos, de Carlos Bracho México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2011/cuentos_cinicos.html

Quisiera hablar de… El misterio de las palabras de Victoria Navarro. Un acercamiento semiótico al texto literario México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/cyl/2012/012012_CineLibros.html

Del objeto a la cosas. Una disertación en torno de los elementos México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/varia/N78/23_Arroyo_V78_V02.pdf

Quisiera hablar de… Polvo de Oro de Rosalba Morán Tejeira México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/N/N88/Resenas/03_Arroyo_R88.pdf

Entrevista a Juana Castillo Escobar, escritora, locutora, directora de la Revista “Pluma y Tintero” México. Razón y Palabra http://www.razonypalabra.org.mx/N/N89/RE89/01_Arroyo_E89.pdf

La cocina Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://en.calameo.com/read/0010315502e7583b4ed91

Segundo Sueño Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://es.calameo.com/read/001031550edb069d96a2b

La cocina Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/nc2ba-3_revista-literaria_octubre-noviembre-diciembre-2010_pdf2.pdf

Gitano Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/nc2ba-6_revista-literaria_mayo-junio_20111.pdf

Adiós Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/nc2ba-7_revista-literaria_julio-agosto-201121.pdf

En la tumba del Señor Farfán Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nc2ba-10_enero-febrero_20123.pdf

Diversidad Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/nc2ba-14_sepbre-octubre_2012-protegido.pdf

El toro Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/nc2ba-12_mayo-junio_20121.pdf

Ratas Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/nc2ba-25_julio-agosto-2014-protegido.pdf

Puente sobre aguas turbulentas Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero http://revistaliterariaplumaytintero.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/revista-literaria-pluma-y-tintero.html

Más sabe el diablo Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://revistaliterariaplumaytintero.blogspot.com/2014/12/indice-revista-n-27-noviembre-diciembre.html

Los anteojos Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://en.calameo.com/read/0010315503ae55063ea9c

Ella Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://en.calameo.com/read/001031550a14b581250c0

Hoy Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://en.calameo.com/read/001031550e9669464341a

A tu lado Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/nc2ba-51_novbre-diciembre-2018_protegido.pdf

Como un colibrí Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/nc2ba-52_enero-febrero-2019_protegido.pdf

La uña enterrada Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/nc2ba-53_marzo-abril-2019_protegido.pdf

Mi abuela Madrid, España. Pluma y Tintero https://lafaja7.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/nc2ba-54_mayo-junio-2019_protegido.pdf

“Fémur” Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2007/Hontanar_diciembre_2007.pdf

Sobre el español, este, nuestro idioma Australia. Hontanar http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_febrero_08.pdf

Lo que el cine debe a la literatura Australia. Hontanar. http://cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_marzo_08.pdf

El cine y la música: imágenes visuales y auditivas Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_abril_2008.pdf

El cine mexicano: de Cantinflas a Amores perros Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_mayo_08.pdf

El cine mexicano o: de Cantinflas a Amores perros 2ª. parte Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_junio_08.pdf

El cine mexicano o: de Cantinflas a Amores perros 3ª. parte Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_julio_2008.pdf

En la tumba del señor Farfán Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_octubre_08.pdf

Algo sobre el cine sueco Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2008/Hontanar_Diciembre_08.pdf

Todo sobre Australia, la película Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_enero_2009.pdf

América no es Estados Unidos, o… un poco de geografía, historia y lingüística Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_marzo_2009.pdf

¿Inmigrante o extranjero? Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_abril_2009.pdf

El maestro de hoy Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_mayo_2009.pdf

Influenza mexicana Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_mayo_2009.pdf

Escritora Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_junio_2009.pdf

Un amigo es un hermano Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_julio_2009.pdf

Un poco del BIFF Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_agosto_2009.pdf

Costa Gavras y “Eden is West”, lo más destacado del cine actual Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_sept_2009.pdf

Las lenguas indígenas en México: una entrevista al maestro Marcelino Hernández Beatriz Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2009/Hontanar_nov_2009.pdf

Peter Jackson vs. Andy García Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2010/Hontanar_febrero_2010.pdf

La mujer… ¿objeto sexual? Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2010/Hontanar_mayo_2010.pdf

Sor Juana, su vida y su Sueño Australia. Hontanar http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2010/Hontanar_julio_2010.pdf

Apostillas al título del poema “Primero Sueño” de Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz Australia. Hontanar http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2010/Hontanar_agosto_2010.pdf

Cristóbal Colón: ¿catalán, gallego, portugués o judío? Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2010/Hontanar_octubre_2010.pdf

La Reina Roja y Sor Juana Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_febrero_2011.pdf

De las bibliotecas personales y los libros más deseados Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_abril_2011.pdf

Acuérdate de Acapulco, María Bonita Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_mayo_2011.pdf

Democracia lingüística Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_junio_2011.pdf

Nuestra Señora de la Cueva Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_julio_2011.pdf

Violencia, muerte, desastre… la tristeza de la actualidad Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_agosto_2011.pdf

Himno Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_septiembre_2011.pdf

Y ahora todos, ¡a cocinar! Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2011/Hontanar_diciembre_2011.pdf

No todo lo que es oro, brilla; o… todo es un remake Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_marzo_2012.pdf

El misterio de las palabras de Victoria Navarro Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_abril_2012.pdf

El día internacional del libro y de la monarquía Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_mayo_2012.pdf

Carlos Fuentes Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_junio_2012.pdf

Numerología en el Primero Sueño de Sor Juana Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_agosto_2012.pdf

Matemático Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_octubre_2012.pdf

Mi trabajo, mi hobby Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2012/Hontanar_diciembre_2012.pdf

La gran transformación de México Australia. Hontanar. http://www.cervantespublishing.com/Hontanar/2013/Hontanar_enero_2013.pdf

Gabriela Cagua, Venezuela. Letralia. http://www.letralia.com/198/letras04.htm

Archivera Cagua, Venezuela, Letralia http://www.letralia.com/186/letras14.htm

Don Goyo Cagua, Venezuela. Letralia http://www.letralia.com/194/letras10.htm

Los anteojos Cagua, Venezuela. Letralia https://letralia.com/letras/2015/10/14/los-anteojos/

Ella se llamaba Laura Cagua, Venezuela. Letralia https://letralia.com/letras/2016/12/01/ella-se-llamaba-laura/

Segundo sueño Buenos Aires, Argentina. Químicamente impuro http://quimicamenteimpuro.blogspot.com/search/label/Susana%20Arroyo-Furphy

Buenas noches Buenos Aires, Argentina. Químicamente impuro. Breves no tan breves https://brevesnotanbreves.blogspot.com/2009/02/buenas-noches-susana-arroyo-furphy.html

Escritora / Inefable Buenos Aires, Argentina. Químicamente impuro. Breves no tan breves https://brevesnotanbreves.blogspot.com/search/label/Susana%20Arroyo-Furphy

Las soledades y el blog (de Sor Juana, monja del siglo XVII a Led Zeppelin, Nick Cave o Arvo Pärt) Madrid, España. Narrar en la era digital. Espéculo: Revista de Estudios Literarios http://webs.ucm.es/info/especulo/Narrar_en_la_era_digital_Especulo_54_UCM_2015.pdf

Translations (French into Spanish): Francés Bernard Lamizet Ensayo, estudio crítico Sémiotique de la Lecture Razón y Palabra No. 38 Semiótica e Informática: una nueva alianza México 2004 ISSN 1605-4806 Francés Odile Le Guern Ensayo, estudio crítico Décrire une tableau: des mots sur une image ou l’inrexation de l’ouvre picturale sur CD-rom comme description em Kit Razón y Palabra No. 38 Semiótica e Informática: una nueva alianza México 2004 ISSN 1605-4806 Francés Nicole Pignier L’approache sémiotique de la publicité on line Razón y Palabra No. 38 Semiótica e Informática: una nueva alianza México 2004 ISSN 1605-4806

Awards:

1er lugar Narrativa, cuento “Escritora” Omar Darío Ruiz Buenos Aires, Argentina 2007 Publicación en CD interactivo Narrativa, cuento “Gatos” Palabras Malditas México, D. F. 2008 3er lugar Narrativa, cuento “Botas” Gabriela Gammarota Temperely, Argentina 2008 Publicación Narrativa, cuento “El que se va y el que se queda” Enrique Gracia Trinidad y Emilio Porta Madrid 2011

Contributions in Journals: Razón y Palabra México Mensual Miembro del comité editorial y columnista 2007 Hasta la fecha Hontanar Australia Mensual Miembro del comité editorial y articulista 2008 2012 Athens Journal of Philology Atenas, Grecia Semestral Arbitraje 2014 Hasta la fecha


Susana Furphy (talk) 11:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Susana Furphy. Wikipedia is mainly interested in what other people have written about you, not so much in what you've written. If Wikipedia were to have a biography of you, it could list books you've written and all creative work (short stories, poems, etc.). It would not list chapters, prologs, introductions, articles, or other less-than-book-length non-fiction works. It won't have an article about you at all, though, unless you meet the inclusion criteria (are notable). For academics, those criteria are explained in WP:PROF. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:12:22, 27 November 2019 review of draft by A Iannone


I have made the changes suggested by The Mirror Cracked for the Francesco Grillo article but it has still not been published. Is there anything else I need to do? Thanks! A Iannone (talk) 12:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A Iannone. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed since early October. The current backlog is 3-4 months, so you can anticipate action within the next six weeks or so. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:15:47, 27 November 2019 review of submission by 1530swimmer


1530swimmer (talk) 15:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1530swimmer, Well it hasn't been referenced correctly. You can't use the company's own website. And the references are chock full of errors. But the main issue is: this company just doesn't seem to be notable. They seem to a run of the mill company, like any of the millions of other businesses in the world. WIkipedia doesn't cover every company or person, only those that are notable, i.e. have been significantly covered in reliable sources. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Nothing that I submit is being approved and I would like to understand why. Everything that has been posted has been sufficiently referenced from trusted sources.

Request on 15:18:32, 27 November 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Anotherlinguist


Hello, my new article on an academic book series has been rejected. I'm thankful for the reviewer's rigorous checking. At the same time, I would like to ask what kind of independent references are expected for the existence of a book series (other than the publisher's website)? I had modelled the page based on an existing article about a different book series in linguistics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_and_Computers

Grateful for any tips.

Anotherlinguist (talk) 15:18, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anotherlinguist, Be careful about comparing your article to existing ones. Many of the articles on WIkipedia were created before we began the rigorous Article for Creation process. That means a lot of ...honestly junk articles were created, and many of them have slipped through the cracks. You can read more about the logical fallacies involved in article comparison at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The Language and Computers article is..utter trash and not what you should base your article off of. You should look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article for a guide on how to make an article about a book.
In terms of sources, the publishers website is not independent. You usually need at least 3 reviews of the book for it qualify. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:28:52, 27 November 2019 review of draft by RobLewis8

I still don’t understand how this article was declined. I provided the links to sources, and this is built like any typical hockey team Wikipedia page, I don’t see how there’s an issue here.


RobLewis8 (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RobLewis8, You don't have enough sources to show that the subject is notable, ie they qualify for a Wikipedia article. The website for the team can't be used as a source, as that is not independent. Only reliable and independent sources can be used. And you need at least 3 sources that give the subject significant coverage to show notability. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CaptainEek, so what you are telling me is that if I replace the team's website with another source, the article will be approved?

17:50:55, 27 November 2019 review of draft by CharlesMerrimack


How doI link key words in an article to other appearances of that key word if there are useful references. For example, in my draft of the Steve Kropper entry, there is a reference to his work in super-insulation on that page. Advice please. Thanks. CharlesMerrimack (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CharlesMerrimack, Internal links can be made by using double square brackets, i.e. using [[Cow]] renders as Cow. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:09, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:26:50, 27 November 2019 review of draft by 68.103.78.155

I Created the 2020-21 United States Network Television Schedule 8 Weeks Ago Because i Put 6 References in and it's been 2 months and still no article. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy hello! Please be patient, your draft is in the review queue and a reviewer will get to it in time. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=928254976"