Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Laser brain/Questions
Appearance
Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:
#{{ACE Question
|Q=Your question
|A=}}
Question from Peacemaker67
- What do you think about the decision to accept Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort? In particular, considering the lack of prior dispute resolution attempts or attempt to use ANI to deal with the behavioural issues. Why or why not?
- As I mentioned in my statement, ArbCom should be a mechanism of last resort. I think the decision to accept the case was a poor one based on the initial filing. That said, ANI can be ineffective at handling long-term behavioral issues and if a tightly defined case had been made detailing such issues with illustrations that community options had been exhausted, accepting would be reasonable. --Laser brain (talk) 00:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Question from Rschen7754
- Why did you resign adminship in 2017? --Rschen7754 05:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Question from Carrite
- What's the biggest problem with Arbcom? Is it fixable or inherent?
Question from Banedon
- Were there any votes in the last few years which you would have voted against what turned out to be the majority decision? If so, which, and why?
- If the answer to the above is no, how would you have voted on certain remedies that split the current committee? Feel free to pick your own remedies; otherwise you can also choose from these: [1], [2], [3]. (Feel free to answer this question as well even if the answer to the above is "yes", although it likely won't be necessary.)