Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 76
![]() | This is an archive of past requests. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new request or revive an old one, please do so on the Resource Request page. |
sources for chemist Betty Sullivan
{{resolved}}
Hello. I'm looking for access to these articles by Chemical & Engineering News for my draft on Betty Sullivan. Unfortunately, Gale only has the indexes.
"Betty Sullivan Awarded Osborne Medal by Cereal Chemists". Chemical & Engineering News. 26 (24): 1767. 14 June 1948. doi:10.1021/cen-v026n024.p1767."New Honors for Sullivan and Smith". Chemical & Engineering News. 32 (12): 1138–1144. 22 March 1954. doi:10.1021/cen-v032n012.p1138."Deaths". Chemical & Engineering News. 78 (22): 80–81. 29 May 2000. doi:10.1021/cen-v078n022.p080.
Also, according to this book, she was featured in Chemtech 6 pages 738-743. I assume this is the magazine Chemical Technology by American Chemical Society but I'm not sure. This one is an extra in comparison to the other three. Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333:
Sent #2 and #3 (both from American Chemical Society Journals). My access to ACS only gives the abstract for #1. I can't find the last one – the full citation of the article would help. —Bruce1eetalk 21:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: That's the thing. I don't know the full citation for the last one. But thank you for #2 and #3! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: I think this may be #1. —Bruce1eetalk 06:29, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yep; same. ∯WBGconverse 15:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Strange I didn't find that link. Thank you both! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Yep; same. ∯WBGconverse 15:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- As the Chemtech one is vague and since I already made the article, I'll resolved this one. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
one page from Texas Biographical Dictionary third edition
{{resolved}} Hello. I am looking for page 352 only of this book for my draft on William S. White.
- Onofrio, Jan (1996). Texas Biographical Dictionary. 2 (Third ed.). Somerset Publishers Inc. p. 352. ISBN 040309951X.
I have 353-354 via GBooks and unfortuantely 352 isn't available. This is from the second volume of the third edition. Thank you! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333:
Sent page 352. —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: Thank you, but that's not what I'm looking for. I presume it's the wrong edition. See here --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 13:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: The edition I looked at is this one, and I can see page 352. Now if you click on "About this book" in the left column of my edition and look at the "Bibliographic information" at the bottom of the page, it matches the corresponding "Bibliographic information" of the edition you looked at. What is interesting is that the page 352 I can see now, isn't the same as the one I saw earlier. I think Google Books is playing games with me! —Bruce1eetalk 14:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: It also could be that the url I have has both volume 1 and volume 2 (with the same page numbers). I need volume 2. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: Have you received this page? If not, Bruce1ee, would you please try again? I'm suspecting the page you saw the second time, which you say is different than what you initially sent, is the one that MrLinkinPark333 is looking for, and you seem to be the only one with access to it. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: The page I found has the biography of Carl Urbantke, not William S. White. As MrLinkinPark333 pointed out above, it seems I'm looking at the wrong edition. —Bruce1eetalk 13:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: Ah. You said above,
"the page 352 I can see now, isn't the same as the one I saw earlier"
, which I took to mean that you had found something else after MrLinkinPark333 said you provided him the wrong thing. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)- @Compassionate727: Sorry, I didn't make myself very clear last month. Neither this page, nor the page I sent on 12 August cover William S. White. —Bruce1eetalk 13:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: Ah. You said above,
- @Compassionate727: The page I found has the biography of Carl Urbantke, not William S. White. As MrLinkinPark333 pointed out above, it seems I'm looking at the wrong edition. —Bruce1eetalk 13:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: Have you received this page? If not, Bruce1ee, would you please try again? I'm suspecting the page you saw the second time, which you say is different than what you initially sent, is the one that MrLinkinPark333 is looking for, and you seem to be the only one with access to it. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: It also could be that the url I have has both volume 1 and volume 2 (with the same page numbers). I need volume 2. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: The edition I looked at is this one, and I can see page 352. Now if you click on "About this book" in the left column of my edition and look at the "Bibliographic information" at the bottom of the page, it matches the corresponding "Bibliographic information" of the edition you looked at. What is interesting is that the page 352 I can see now, isn't the same as the one I saw earlier. I think Google Books is playing games with me! —Bruce1eetalk 14:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: Thank you, but that's not what I'm looking for. I presume it's the wrong edition. See here --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 13:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Bruce1ee: In the above link you shown today, White is covered there p. 352 not 325. However, 352 is not part of the page preview. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: I'm sorry, I've really screwed things up, haven't I? I read 352 as 325! Although I did get the first page number I sent you on 12 August right, but it appears to have been from another edition. —Bruce1eetalk 16:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- No worries @Bruce1ee:! Even with a different version, the page is still elusive lol. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: I'm sorry, I've really screwed things up, haven't I? I read 352 as 325! Although I did get the first page number I sent you on 12 August right, but it appears to have been from another edition. —Bruce1eetalk 16:49, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: I've request this book via ILL. It will hopefully arrive within a week. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC) (re-ping —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:52, 3 October 2019 (UTC))
- @MrLinkinPark333: Alright, got it. Please send me an email. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Sent —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: courteousy ping —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333: Alright, got it. Please send me an email. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Compassionate727: Yep I got it. Sent an email back in request for the bibliographic info as it seems to be different than the Gbooks version. Thanks again!. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333:
Sent bibliographic info. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MrLinkinPark333:
- Shears, Philip James (1948). The Story of the Border Regiment, 1939-1945. London: Nisbet. pp. xiv, 95–100. OCLC 4660861.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Surtees, George (1955). A Short History of XX Lancashire Fusiliers. London: Malcolm Page Ltd. pp. 64–80. OCLC 30182521.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
I am currently expanding the 66th Infantry Division (United Kingdom), a British Army division that was active for less than a year. I have the created the basic outline of the division's history, but the article could do with some specific details. I have been able to identify these two sources as ones that could add a little more detail to the article. The page numbers for Surtees are rough based off what I could access, the pages that deal with the 2/5th, 2/6th, and 2/8th Battalions are the ones that are relevant to the article. Many thanks EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hm, not sure about Bellezzasolo's current availability, just wondered if you could possibly help with this request since both of these (rare) volumes are held at Bodleian (off-site)?: 1, 2. All the best, — Pajz (talk) 18:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Pajz, I'll be back in Oxford on 10th October, so if anyone can fulfil sooner, do! ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 11:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you guys for looking into this. If you are able to do to so in October, if no one else can before hand, it would be greatly appreciated.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Bellezzasolo, is this something you will still be able to assist with? Kind regardsEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- EnigmaMcmxc,
Doing..., should arrive in a day or two. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 15:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Excellent, hopefully with those extra details this article will then be ready to go towards GA status. Thank you so much for the assist.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Bellezzasolo: Are you still working on this? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:40, 15 October 2019 (UTC) re-ping —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Excellent, hopefully with those extra details this article will then be ready to go towards GA status. Thank you so much for the assist.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- EnigmaMcmxc,
- Hello Bellezzasolo, is this something you will still be able to assist with? Kind regardsEnigmaMcmxc (talk) 01:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you guys for looking into this. If you are able to do to so in October, if no one else can before hand, it would be greatly appreciated.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Pajz, I'll be back in Oxford on 10th October, so if anyone can fulfil sooner, do! ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 11:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
:Compassionate727, Sent I've got the pages requested and sent an email. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 09:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Received, thank you so much. Look forward to looking through the information to see what can be done to expand the article. {{resolved}}
More magnetic circuit modelling – Buntenbach
Buntenbach, "A generalized circuit model for multiwinding inductive devices", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1970.Buntenbach, A comprehensive circuit model for the electromechanical/Acoustic transducer, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 1971.
This one, for which I found the abstract here, I couldn't find on IEEEXplore,
- Buntenbach, "Improved circuit models for inductors wound on dissipative magnetic cores", IEEE Asilomer Conference on Circuits and Systems, 10 September 1968.
Thanks, SpinningSpark 16:52, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Spinningspark:
Sent #1 and #2 (from IEEE Xplore). —Bruce1eetalk 17:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, got them, but please hold this open. I think #3 is going to be the most useful paper if it can be found. SpinningSpark 17:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Spinningspark, sent #3 (the citation needs some work), — Pajz (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, {{resolved}}
The Sasanians and the Sistanis
- Rezakhani, Khodadad (2017). ReOrienting the Sasanians: East Iran in Late Antiquity. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 1–256. ISBN 978-1-4744-0030-5.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
Need the first chapter "The Sasanians and the Sistanis". Would greatly appreciate it, since expansion is sorely needed in this rather obscure area, namely the Indo-Parthian Kingdom article.
Thanks, HistoryofIran (talk) 00:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @HistoryofIran: So far you've asked for and received copies of 4 of the book's 11 chapters in separate requests. You're beyond the point that Wikipedia can make a good case for copying more under "fair use". If the source is so useful to your work, don't be a cheapskate, buy it. A used paperback should cost less than 30 euros with shipping to Denmark, an electronic copy might be even less. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Funnily enough I've already bought it from Amazon, yet it has no pages (it has "locations" instead, as I've already mentioned here before), so thus useless for work. Not buying it again, that's silly. Also, no need to patronise me (I very well know the price) nor call me a "cheapskate", mind your manners. Unlike you, mayhaps I know how to use my money appropriately? If having more parts of the book is against the rules, then fine, I understand. You could have just only said that instead of taking a dig at me as well. Like you and many others, I'm just here to improve this site. Just close this section then. HistoryofIran (talk)
- @HistoryofIran: Sources without page numbers, like ebooks, can still be used in citations. According to WP:PAGENUM the relevant text can be identified by chapter- and/or section-titles. —Bruce1eetalk 05:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @HistoryofIran:
Sent. --Gazal world (talk) 09:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @HistoryofIran:
- @HistoryofIran: Sources without page numbers, like ebooks, can still be used in citations. According to WP:PAGENUM the relevant text can be identified by chapter- and/or section-titles. —Bruce1eetalk 05:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
{{resolved}}
Richard D. Chessick article
Hello, I am looking for Richard D. Chessick's article "Prolegomena to the study of paul Ricoeur's Freud and Philosophy", for use at Freud and Philosophy. Publication details: (1988). Psychoanalytic Review, 75(2):299-318. ISSN 0033-2836. There is a relevant link here.
Thanks, Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 09:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Freeknowledgecreator: Please send me an email. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Compassionate727. I have emailed you. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Freeknowledgecreator:
Sent —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 23:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Freeknowledgecreator:
- Hello Compassionate727. I have emailed you. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
{{resolved}}
"A Tree Grows in Guadalajara" sources
Hello everyone! I am slowly working on the "A Tree Grows in Guadalajara" article. I am primarily gathering all of the materials in my sandbox and doing some organization and reading while I am currently on a wikibreak. I would greatly appreciate the following four journal articles as they deal with a more critical analysis of this particular episode of Ugly Betty:
- Amaya, Hector (2010). "Citizenship, diversity, law and Ugly Betty". Media, Culture & Society. 32 (5). SAGE Publishing: 801-817. doi:10.1177/0163443710373954.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Avila-Saavedra, Guillermo (2010). "A Fish Out of Water: New Articulations of U.S.–Latino Identity on Ugly Betty". Communication Quarterly. 58 (2). Routledge: 133-147. doi:10.1080/01463371003773416.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Denzel de Tirado, Heidi (2013). "Media Monitoring and Ethnicity: Representing Latino Families on American Television (2000-2013)". Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. OpenEdition Journals. doi:10.4000/nuevomundo.66165.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Graf, Amara (2015). "A Queer Telenovela: Transformative Representations of the Maricón and the Macho in Ugly Betty". The Journal of Popular Culture. 48 (2). Wiley-Blackwell: 328-340. doi:10.1111/jpcu.12260.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
Apologies for the frequent requests. Hopefully, one day, I will have access to these journals and databases. I am very appreciative of all the help and support that I have received from the Wikipedia community. Thank you as always. Aoba47 (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Doing... —Bruce1eetalk 05:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Aoba47:
Sent #1, #2 and #4 (from Sage, Taylor & Francis and Wiley respectfully); #3 appears to be available in full at OpenEdition here. —Bruce1eetalk 06:05, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. {{resolved}} Aoba47 (talk) 06:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Aoba47: