Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Image optimization

Image optimization

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a Frankenstein article that employs the synthesis of published material to advance a position not supported by those material. It provides nothing more meaningful than the phrase "image optimization" itself.

Since the article is small, let's take a look at it piece by piece. The first sentence says:

Image optimization is the process of altering an image to improve its quality and visual appearance.

So far, this is the same as image editing. The next few sentences, however, cease to support this definition and only make sense when you put them in medical imaging context, where imaging is not the creation of what you see with your eyes, but merely a mean of creating 2D representations of the data in which you're interested. The sources confirm this error. The last sentence in the first paragraph is this:

Software that may incorporate one or more of these algorithms are called "digital image optimizers" (DIO).

The source does not confirm this. It merely says DIO is an acronym for "digital image optimizer". Whether it is an app, library, piece of hardware, or human technician is not known.

This article is created by a single author and has not received a peer review. It has no inbound links. I should note, however, that it is important to assume good faith in its author. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It is not nice to AfD an article just eight hours after its creation. Maybe its editor is a newbie and is still working on it. 31.7.119.23 (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]