Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quest for the Code

Quest for the Code

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references seems to be press releases , or incidental mentions--there are no references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Of the references already in the article, the Hollywood Reporter article[1] is a good one, as is the Univeristy of Syracuse PhD dissertation[2]. There also seems to have been significant academic interest in the topic. This is enough to convince me that WP:GNG is met. Lowercaserho (talk) 10:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Has enough references to be meet WP:GNG however cannot remain an article in its current state. Either Improve enough to Keep, Disambiguate or Draft the article until it becomes a passable article. Spy-cicle (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is an impressively-sourced article, with numerous RSes being dug up from the depths of obscurity. Phediuk (talk) 01:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With that many famous people involved why would you not think it had ample coverage out there? Finding articles written back then online isn't as easy as things are now. Doesn't matter though, that many famous people worked together to create something, its notable, let it be by rules of common sense. Dream Focus 00:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Starlight Children's Foundation. Filled with puffery and advertisement-like language, it doesn't have any particular reason to be a standalone article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 05:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - seems to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]