Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Parinthacker (talk | contribs) at 14:06, 10 September 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 4

01:40:51, 4 September 2019 review of draft by Lbrad75344


Lbrad75344 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Can podcast interviews be cited and used as references?

@Lbrad75344: - interviews usually aren't suitable for sources anyway because they aren't independent (as functionally all the content is coming from the subject or a related subject)
In terms of reliability, it could still struggle as it requires editorial control and I don't know if podcasts apply them. A case could be made for things like reliable organisations that also have podcasts Nosebagbear (talk) 09:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

02:19:04, 4 September 2019 review of submission by Wangsophie110


I think the subject is now notable enough to publish. Can someone double check this? Wangsophie110 (talk) 02:19, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:53:58, 4 September 2019 review of submission by Omafeni

Hello am wondering why my draft is taking so long. its 2 months now so i wonder if i made some errors before submission. please help me check and see if everything is right

Omafeni (talk) 08:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Omafeni: - in terms of making a submission, it's fine, (I've not reviewed it, just checked it uploaded etc). However, over the last 6 months or so we've received a very high rate of submissions, so our backlog has increased dramatically. The oldest draft has been there for about 14 weeks, so I'm afraid further patience will be needed. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

== Hi. I'm Ms. Smarty Pant. I was wodering why is my article declined. Please reply ASAP. thx

As explained in the decline notice, the topic already exists here Japanese poetry. Theroadislong (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:52:20, 4 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by ShreyasShimpi


Hello, I have written an article for a Wikipedia page on Abhhyuday, IIT Bombay. But the reviewer has sent a message regarding copyright violation. But I am from the same association for which I am writing the article for Wikipedia page. I require assistance for how should I proceed now.

ShreyasShimpi (talk) 10:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ShreyasShimpi: - you can't just choose to use copyrighted text even if you're from that organisation and they want you to make it. All text in Wikipedia has to be given a very broad license, and we need evidence the copyright holder wants to give that license. Please bear in mind that would give everyone the right to use the copyrighted text how they wished - you can't just license it to Wikipedia.
Please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials, and if you're planning on donating both photos and text, you'll need to read all of it. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:48:15, 4 September 2019 review of submission by Natashajones0329


Hello,

I am not posting this as a promotional aspect. Keo is well known in the Denver area and has achieved many awards and has also been a crucial part of the community for years.

Natashajones0329 (talk) 18:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is stuffed with some of the most promotional trumpery I have ever come across in a draft article……“Selflessly, Keo has donated countless hours of time” “the honor of winning more than eight award” “homecoming queen, and prom queen, and was seen as a leader and do-gooder from a young age” “has accomplished more in her young life than most accomplish in a lifetime” “passionate about making positive impacts “ and far more. Theroadislong (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:10:57, 4 September 2019 review of draft by Ellencooper


I am a writer, but not a coder! For this article, I wanted to create a section to cite books I consulted for the creation of this article, but I have formatted it incorrectly. The result is a citation has migrated into the body of the article text, and the "Resources" are in a contiguous block - hard to read! I do not know how to correct the formatting and am anxious to not lose the cited books text, so I have frozen like a deer in the headlights!

In addition, I have gotten Dr. Peter Cooke to give permission [Ticket#2019090410006677] to use a photo to attach to this article, and have asked him to identify the article to James Howes at Wikimedia; I should also have another photo of Linda Williamson permitted to the Commons by Peter Dibdin in a day or two. Can you tell me how I will be able to find those photos?

Ultimately, I wanted to create this article, so that I could link it in one about Duncan Williamson. It mentions Linda Headlee with a hyperlink that links to a page with no information. She has been an important figure in this little corner of song/story collecting.

Thank you for your help! Celia Ramsay (aka Ellen Cooper)

Ellencooper (talk) 19:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellencooper. I left a welcome basket of links on your talk page to help you get oriented. One of the links, Citing sources, leads to much useful information, including Help:Referencing for beginners.
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials describes how someone can license photos appropriately for Wikipedia. I don't know whether the images have already been published online, or what procedure the donors are choosing to follow, so you may need to coordinate with them to answer your question. Or you may be able to find the images on Wikimedia Commons by searching after the donors have uploaded them. The presence or absence of images in the draft will not affect whether it is accepted or not, so they should be your lowest priority. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:41:04, 4 September 2019 review of submission by FinJournalist

I believe I cited several high quality news organizations that included interviews with and about the Association. FinJournalist (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FinJournalist. The organization is not notable. The New York Times, The Washington Post, IPO-Edge, Newsweek, and The Real Deal contain passing mentions. The Palm Beach Post has fewer than 100 words about the organization. Financial Post is a reprint of The New York Times. StreetAuthority is authored by the organization's founder. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic. The draft cites zero such sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:35:29, 4 September 2019 review of draft by TVaughanSoCal


I have been trying to put an article together. It has the same links and facts that are published on other pages related to this one. I need help with this as I think I'm doing it correctly then it was declined again. I dont even understand how to reach the person that declined the submission to ask for help. Is there someone I can reach out to that can fix what is wrong? Thank you

TVaughanSoCal (talk) 20:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TVaughanSoCal: - hi there. The reviewer can be seen at the bottom left of each red box. That will take you to their user page, and then you just need to click on Talk. For you, that is Liance's Talk Page
If nothing else you need to learn how to do referencing. There's a written out guide at referencing for beginners. If you have a little time (c.65mins) then there's an interactive tutorial at the Wikipedia Adventure. It's a tad entertainingly cliche, but it has a much higher success rate at actually embedding knowledge than purely reading help pages. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:48:33, 4 September 2019 review of submission by Jaws525


Jaws525 (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Hi, I just got the good news that my article on Pamela Longobardi was accepted. But I notice that the 2 photos I had in there were taken out. Why? One (the profile picture) came from Longobardi; the picture of Pam-with-Afghan-boy is a picture I took. Can I put them back? Jaws525 (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)Jaws525[reply]

Hi Jaws525. I don't see a time when the page had an image in the infobox. In any case, you may only use an image taken by Longobardi if (A) they upload the image to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons or (B) if they go through the process of Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The picture of of Pam with an Afghan boy was deleted, see the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fig. 13 PamAfghaniBoy CampLesvos.tif. You should not put it back without adequately addressing the concerns that were raised. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 5

00:33:14, 5 September 2019 review of submission by HapHaxion

Hey, I was just wondering: even though I submitted my draft through AfC, I technically have the rights to just create an article outright. Would it be alright if I remove the Draft under AfC and just publish the page? I think I've found enough information for the moment (more can always be added in the future). HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 00:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HapHaxion. You are very strongly discouraged from bypassing AfC for pages, such as Draft:Victoria Barbara, with which you have a conflict of interest. Disregard the guideline at your peril. Another editor recently complained they didn't realize it meant the page would be deleted, which is what happened when they ignored the rule. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. Just wanted to ask. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 03:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

03:04:11, 5 September 2019 review of submission by Chintan Rishabh Jain


Chintan Rishabh Jain (talk) 03:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chintan Rishabh Jain:, it was reasonably rejected due to its advertorial nature. Things like your very first words being "BookMyShow has changed the face of Ticketing System", "The business thrived with no investors from 2002 to 2006" (which actually contradicts your challenges section, which also reads in a "challenges that we can show we faced really well". Nosebagbear (talk) 08:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:45:06, 5 September 2019 review of submission by Coenhornman

Hi thanks for looking at my created wikipedia page about Ruben Pol. I have read the instructions, but I can't figure out where it goes wrong. Could you tell me specific what happend. Thanks in advance.

Coen Coenhornman (talk) 09:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically what happened was as the reject notice says ...this topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:20:02, 5 September 2019 review of submission by Bethany m m


Bethany m m (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:12:33, 5 September 2019 review of draft by Maccer123


I am unsure why my sources are unreliable? The sources cite my name in every publication. The publications are some of the UKs largest newspapers?

Maccer123 (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Maccer123: - publications can be big without being reliable - tabloids are generally or completely unreliable (depending on circumstance and the specific tabloid).
Currently you don't actually have any sources either, which is making it very hard to interpret them - you instead have a number of external links. Please have a read of referencing for beginners
I turned one external link into an example of a reference - there are more and less complicated methods, I chose a fairly easily to duplicate format. One very quick lesson - you can link to other wikipedia articles just by putting them in <nowiki>Subject<nowiki> Nosebagbear (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:55:41, 5 September 2019 review of draft by Vijethnbharadwaj


Vijeth N Bharadwaj 15:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

This Page was Reviewed a couple of days back. But still It is not converted as a main article. Why? Vijeth N Bharadwaj 15:55, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Vijethnbharadwaj: - it is an article. If you search it in Wikipedia you will find it. I don't know if you're asking why you can't find it on google. It's also been patrolled, so it's just waiting to be scraped by google's webspiders, which they'll do in the next couple of days. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:34:34, 5 September 2019 review of submission by Bibliograf


Dear Colleagues, I respect your experience and expertise, and yet I would like you to reconsider. The bilingual writer Olga Zilberbourg, who is only forty years old, has published 4 books in her native Russian and adopted English, has won awards, and has had her work published in major American literary magazines. I think it's important to recognize rising literary authors, and especially so when they are women and immigrants. Thank you for your attention.

Bibliograf (talk) 17:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bibliograf: - it's possible the individual might be notable then, but you haven't included a single reference other than her own website. If you can find a couple of reliable, independent, in-depth reviews for one of her books, then she may be notable. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:32:08, 5 September 2019 review of submission by E-Stylus

Is it within site guidelines to re-submit a draft after a rejection if the content has been improved? Thank you. E-Stylus (talk) 23:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 6

Request on 06:27:23, 6 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Markusandraos


I need help writing an article and making it not sound like an advertisement please.

Wiise Software Pty Ltd [Introduction] Wiise is an end-to-end, integrated, cloud-based business management platform created by KPMG Australia, built on Microsoft, and supported by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). Wiise is built on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (BC) and tailored for small and medium-sized businesses in the Australian market.

[History] Wiise was created by KPMG Australia after acquiring Microsoft systems implementer, Hands-on Systems in 2015. Hands-on Systems was founded in 1985 and is one of Microsoft’s top global partners and is a complete Dynamics enterprise resource planning (AX, NAV) and CRM provider. Financials for Office 365 was spun out from Hands-On Systems in 2014 as a competitor to the likes of Xero and based on Microsoft Dynamics. The independent software vendor (ISV) was a finalist in the 2018 CRN Impact Awards and the 2014 World Wide Microsoft Dynamics Cloud Partner of the Year Awards. In July 2014, Financials for Office 365 won Microsoft’s Global Core Financials Award. After the acquisition, KPMG, CBA, and Microsoft formed a strategic partnership to co-develop Wiise, launching in the Australian market as of July 2018.

[Product] Wiise is an end-to-end business software with banking integration and built-in analytics and reporting, alongside accounting, HR, payroll, inventory and manufacturing functionality. Wiise is available on a subscription basis, as software-as-a-service. The three different packages available are Lite, Business, and Premium. All packages offer accounting, finance management and reporting, basic inventory management, receivables and payables, auto-reconciliation, HR and payroll. The more advanced packages offering more complex functionality for larger or more complicated business through advanced additional operational modules like distribution and warehousing, service management, and manufacturing.

[Awards and recognition] Wiise has been awarded Finalist for Microsoft’s 2019 Dynamics 365 Business Central Partner of the Year Award. The Microsoft Partner of the Year Awards goes to partners who demonstrate excellence in innovation and outstanding success implementing customer solutions based on Microsoft technology.

Markusandraos (talk) 06:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:58:14, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Tommylagestam


Hi. I am requesting a re-review of this as it's a misinterpretation that B-Reel is the "parent company" of B-Reel Films. B-Reel Films (BRF) is an independent film and production studio. B-Reel is a creative (advertising) agency. B-Reel is in no way involved in B-Reel Film's notable work like the film Midsommar, the documentary about Greta Thunberg and the Alicia Vikander feature film Euphoria. Those are B-Reel Films (BRF) productions.

Wikipedia allows separate articles for advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi and M&C Saatchi, even though they are intricately linked. B-Reel and B-Reel Films (BRF) are similarly separate entities. With world famous productions like those aforementioned, it is surprising why B-Reel Films (BRF) would not be considered notable.

Tommylagestam (talk) 06:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:01:19, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Sajacz


May i ask you why you decide that page is advertisement? I want only inform about company here based on other services here like: monday.com trello etc. what is difference ? and why monday and trello are ok ?

Sajacz (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajacz: - so it was rejected on notability grounds because the only source it had came from the company itself. It also has a marketing tone, "Thanks to this overview", "saving you both time and work" etc. Normally I'd refer you to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which explains why you can't use one source being allowed/disallowed to justify another. However, Trello has over a dozen sources and is laid out neutrally. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sajacz: I've tagged the page for Speedy deletion. You may want to review WP:INDEPENDENT WP:RS and WP:PUFFERY. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:27:21, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Maria Sitkina

I added additional references, please check it and approve Maria Sitkina (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:44:39, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Purple anka

Hi! My draft is declined due to being "not properly referenced by independent sources". I did add references, but they're all in the Ukrainian language. Am I only allowed to reference English-language sources when the Wiki article is in English? I was just trying to create an English copy of the existing article about a music band in Ukraine. Thanks for any tips! Purple anka (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Purple anka: - hi there. Ukrainian (or Russia etc) sources are fine - google translate does a reasonable job these days. Running through the sources, they generally aren't sufficient to prove notability for two reasons. Some aren't independent, as they are either directly from the band, or are interviews (where all the answers come from the band). Others aren't really in depth, with only a couple of lines on Karna. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:29:09, 6 September 2019 review of draft by Indigenus~enwiki


Hello, I have been advised that the multiple references for the draft article do not meet the criteria for notability. This is quite confusing, as the following references are multiple, and apparently meet the defined criteria for significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources. Please see below:

1. Coverage in BloombergQuint.com, a prominent financial news portal formed as partnership between Bloomberg and Quintillion media (reference: https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/bloomberg-forms-new-partnership-with-quintillion-media-in-india/). Coverage link: https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/startup-street-this-startup-says-it-can-nearly-wipe-out-your-electricity-bill

2. Coverage in ETEnergyworld.com, a part of The Economic Times, India's largest English financial daily, that focuses on energy news. Coverage link: https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/we-will-achieve-rs-100-cr-annual-revenue-this-financial-year-pranesh-chaudhary-founder-zunroof/70024921

3. Coverage in The Hindu Businessline, a leading, highly-credible financial daily in India. Coverage link: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/specials/clean-tech/lighting-up-your-home-right-from-the-roof/article27198508.ece

4. Coverage in CNBC-TV18, a leading financial news channel (an India-specific venture of CNBC), link: https://www.cnbctv18.com/young-turks/young-turks-troubled-with-high-electricity-bills-heres-how-zunroof-can-solve-your-problems-3828671.htm

5. Coverage in Moneycontrol.com, a prominent financial and business news portal owned by Network 18, a leading media company of India. Link: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/this-startups-solar-power-solutions-is-making-indian-homes-green-and-future-ready-3971841.html

I feel that Zunroof meets the criteria for notability - however I am happy to take feedback from other editors.

Indigenus~enwiki (talk) 08:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:54:05, 6 September 2019 review of submission by Swansonnery


I believe the topic could now be relevant to be included on Wikipedia. If you believe it still is not, I would really appreciate the reasons why, or even the criteria which needs to be met. Thanks!

Swansonnery (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:43:22, 6 September 2019 review of draft by 27.4.251.134


Hi there, it has been more than 50 days since Draft:Foundation Holdings is not yet reviewed. I requested some time back to review it and I am requesting again to kindly review the same. Thanks in advance!


27.4.251.134 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was reviewed and rejected in the meantime for WP:UPE violations. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 7

02:39:12, 7 September 2019 review of submission by AlvinDaKin1342


AlvinDaKin1342 (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


02:44:52, 7 September 2019 review of submission by Amg seyiace


Amg seyiace (talk) 02:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seyiace biography?

Balogun Oluwaseyi Temitope (born February 7) better known by his stage name Seyi Ace is a Nigerian rapper, performer and songwriter. Seyi Ace is an Indigene of Ondo State but was raised and lives in Lagos. . He was signed to a Record Label (not mentioned) where he released he’s first few songs like Igboro. . Seyi Ace started commercial music in 2015 and has been releasing different jams ever since. . Seyi Ace has records like Weed and Dow which recorded over 100k streams on spotify. He released Waka On Stage in 2019 featuring Payper Boi produced by Seriki Poly . Seyi Ace has left he’s former Record Label and is currently with AMG (Ace Music Gang) where he released Record Label featuring Oladips and Davolee which was produced by Seriki Poly. . Seyi Ace has performed in different stages and shut down shows across Nigeria. He has performed alongside DMW signee Idowest and many others.

.

He was on University tour with Cowbell and performed to thousands of people at the Cowbell show. He performed at Obafemi Awolowo University and many others. . Some of the artists he has worked with includes Magneto, Oladips, Davolee, Seriki Poly, Paper Boi and many others. Unreleased records are yet to be produced too.

.

INSTAGRAM ACCOUNT OF SEYI ACE instagram.com/seyiace

06:16:28, 7 September 2019 review of submission by SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL


SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL (talk) 06:16, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:51:57, 7 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Zee2019


Hello,

I am trying to write article about zeeyarah since long time this is my 4th attempt that i got deleted this page. i don't where i am writing something wrong. If you need something for proof just let me know i am just writing about a company which will help people to know more about that company. this company is having all the genuine websites. if you have any doubt you can check the website and contact the company and know more about them. there is nothing wrong which i am writing about that company. please check the article again and please do let me know where do i need to make a change. i will be very thankfull to you.

08:14:02, 7 September 2019 review of submission by SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL


SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL (talk) 08:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SUJIT KUMAR BISWAL: - you seem to have submitted this for review after it was accepted and converted to being an article. Is there a particular issue? Nosebagbear (talk) 22:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:15:43, 7 September 2019 review of draft by KeitaStudio


KeitaStudio (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Thsmi002, Thank You for feedback. Please can You tell me how can I do to resolve this problem that You wrote me? I would like to know how can I do to give significant coverage in the submitted content. The actress is present in the Internet Movie Database and in the cast of the tv series: Commissioner Manara (2011, Davide Marengo, Luca Ribuoli), The Young Montalbano (2015, Gianluca Maria Tavarelli). Let me know, thank You

Hi KeitaStudio. IMDb is user-generated, so it is not a reliable source. Mymovies.it is reliable, but indiscriminate. It aims to cover all of Italian cinema, so it doesn't help demonstrate notability. Google searches don't return independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage of Rogati, only primary source interviews with little or no analysis by the interviewer, tabloid and blog coverage, and trivial mentions. Revisit the topic in a few years, by which time more may have been written about Rogati in independent reliable sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:59, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:53:06, 7 September 2019 review of submission by RobHewes

I am a first time publisher, and although my page seems to have plenty of references, it has been declined for not being adequately supported by reliable sources. I'm unsure what more I need to do. RobHewes (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@RobHewes: - hi there. Sources showing notability need to be secondary, independent, reliable and in-depth. The large majority of your sources come from the club itself and so aren't secondary. The other big group are from southern athletic and only contain a league table - which isn't sufficient for Significant Coverage. Sources don't "stack", so 10 league tables in different sources don't show in-depth coverage. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


September 8

00:17:01, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam


3enjamin.A (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


COMBO 1,2 MYSQL-PASSWORD WIKIPEDIA EDIT MORE ALL OWNER MY NAME BENJAMIN QUINTELA SALDANHA AGUIAM

00:56:28, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam


3enjamin.A (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC) {{SAFESUBST:Void|[reply]

I lost memory so like know what is mine? maybe

Combo 1,2 mysql-password more a few things

no know


if have logins passwords is prove

i no know

need a big help

thanks

01:05:42, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Benjamin Quintela Saldanha Aguiam


3enjamin.A (talk) 01:05, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia i have any edit position ?

This is still not even suitable to be a draft, let alone an article as it has no content. I'm not sure what you are wanting to ask. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:16:45, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Chintan Rishabh Jain


Chintan Rishabh Jain (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chintan Rishabh Jain: - you need to say what you want or are asking about. I confirmed the initial review 3 days ago (Sept 5th), if it's not about that, then please clarify. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:48:44, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Kalpatru


Kalpatru (talk) 10:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalpatru: - I'm not sure what you're asking about. This isn't currently submitted to become an article (see article wizard for that). However, it also has no reliable secondary sources, so it will automatically be rejected if submitted before being improved. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:16:48, 8 September 2019 review of submission by Aghiadhokan

I have noted that other software published wikipedia pages cite the official website as a reference, I have also put some additional references and the official Youtube channel of this application in order to directly refer to its features. The information is also generic and can be tested and proved by anyone who visits the official website, and download and test the application. Aghiadhokan (talk) 13:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aghiadhokan:, while a link to the company's site should generally be included, it doesn't provide anything to showing notability. All the sources here are either non-independent (they're linked to vimert) and/or non-reliable (such as a wiki or youtube). As a product, it needs to meet the same higher notability guidelines as a company. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 9

08:45:05, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Timon Stathakis


Dear

Pls could you let me know how many more references i require to upload the article ? thank you

Timon Stathakis (talk) 08:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Timon Stathakis: - I rejected this draft as no independent/reliable sources contained any info on him, and a look elsewhere didn't indicate that any other such sources existed. I don't believe any degree of editing can fix this - he just doesn't appear notable, by wiki standards (yet) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:48:11, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Timon Stathakis


Dear Good day ,

pls could give me some advise in order to upload the article.

thank you

Timon Stathakis (talk) 08:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Answered above Nosebagbear (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks you update some further info for this to be notable. Hopefully this will improve the article.
@Timon Stathakis: - your sources are still all about the company (or written by the company), so tell us nothing about reliable/independent about the individual. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear i will to get some more reference reliable about the individual thanks for your feed back . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timon Stathakis (talk • contribs) 13:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:19:30, 9 September 2019 review of submission by CJLewis1990


Good Afternoon,

I understand & accept you have certain criteria for English football clubs however I would like to appeal for a re-review in this instance.

I am a senior volunteer for the club and everything about the way the club is set up and is being run is professional. There are some key personnel involved with Wakefield AFC which is owned by FBT Sports. As you will see from the references provided, former Manchester United player Chris Turner is currently the Coach & Director of Football. Having a Wikipedia page is seen by all involved as a key part of our plans going forward. The page I have set up initially may lack in depth information however this will be frequently updated as the club progresses.

If you could re-review this I would be highly appreciative.

CJLewis1990 (talk) 11:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that in Wikipedia terms the club is not notable and Wikipedia has no interest in your "plans going forward" it is not a venue for promotion of any kind. Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:54:18, 9 September 2019 review of submission by JamesRodir


Hello helpers, could you please describe why do you think the company is not notable enough or where the sources are weak and nonreliable? I have read WP:NCORP and I found that the sources I added are independent of the subject and the company has more than 1 million customers which I believe is a lot. They have been mentioned by the NY times, business insider, mastercard newsroom and a bunch of other press. They have a important partnership with Mastercard and even the Canada Revenue Agency allowed canadians to use Plastiq to pay taxes. And there is for example Cash App a mobile payment service with the same type of sources and I do not see how are they more notable. I appreciate your reply

JamesRodir (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sources need to cover the company in-depth as far as I can see you have a lot of passing mentions, press releases and blogs none of which are sufficient to establish notability. The fact that other stuff exists is irrelevant. Theroadislong (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Theroadislong: I know its irrelevant but what I meant is that if they are live we as editors can use it as example. thats my logic there. Most of the articles are about plastiq and its services there are some that just mention the company but they help stablish notability I think. Take for example this one https://www.businessinsider.com/is-plastiq-app-worth-it-safe-2018-6 or https://www.pymnts.com/news/b2b-payments/2018/plastiq-commercial-cards-electronic/ aren't these reliable sources? I need a little more insight because I still do not get why wouldn't Plastiq be notable enough for the encyclopedia. Its a company with many clients, press, great partnerships, and there are more than 70 results of Plastiq in google news, this has to count for something. JamesRodir (talk) 21:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:35:25, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Dancemaven


Hi there, I am requesting assistance because eight weeks have now passed since the Draft was submitted. Is there any way to expedite a review, or, at least to request that this draft receive some attention? Many thanks.

Dancemaven (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dancemaven: - due to the major backlog, the oldest of our drafts have been in the queue for twice that length. Most reviewers don't specifically target requested drafts, so a degree of patience will be required.
It's not required, but it might be worth seeing if you can get hyperlinks to the online versions of some of your more recent sources.
Particularly focus (sources and content) on the individual himself - it's not a combained Hollander/company article, so while obviously it will include content on that, it doesn't need a detailed run through of the company/studio's actions Nosebagbear (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:26:01, 9 September 2019 review of submission by Bibliograf


Colleagues, good afternoon. As per your suggestions, I've added three solid references, and I hope this will now suffice. Thank you.

Bibliograf (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted it for review again on your behalf as a good case has been made for notability now being possible to show. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:44:25, 9 September 2019 review of draft by Fitwithjan

I just worked for 3 hours adding 27 references to Let It Be Art! new page and I pushed Publish these changes, but when I did, it disappeared on me. I wasn't thinking, I should have copied it. Where did it go, I am very upset, then when I tried to find out where it went, all I had was a blank page and of course you turned it down. Where did all my changes and original revisions and new references go to Let It Be Art! Why wasn't I given enough time to add all the references. I took three hours to do it, but I don't know where it is, PLEASE HELPPPP!!!Fitwithjan (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:33:04, 9 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by SKSVMACET19


We have a non profit making Engg college in a remote village in India. Wanted to give a small article on this college.


SKSVMACET19 (talk) 19:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 10

02:18:55, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Chamberednautilus


Check neutral point of view and notability for draft article titled "Adam S. Weinberg". Chamberednautilus (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC) I am requesting an opinion about whether or not the current draft article for "Adam S. Weinberg" meets the Wikipedia standard for 'neutral point of view'. Also, I would appreciate confirmation if the subject of this draft article meets the Wikipedia standard for 'notability'. This draft article was first submitted for review on 9 May 2019. I've made changes to the text in response to a reviewer's comment to create a more neutral point of view. Are any further changes recommended? Thank-you, Chamberednautilus[reply]

Hi Chamberednautilus. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed since 16 May. The backlog stands at 5 months, so you can anticipate a review, which will consider the issues you raised, around the middle of October. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:27:28, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Farzanfa007

please review Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club  it's urgent please..

Farzan F A 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

The page reads like an advertisement. Will require fundamental rewrite. This community is driven by volunteers, nothing is "urgent". Please do not act entitled. Coderzombie (talk) 09:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:54, 10 September 2019 review of submission by 167.98.1.141


167.98.1.141 (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:41, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

Hello,

There was a grammatical error in the sentence which we have rectified and replaced it with the old one.

Kindly review the same.

Regards, Chirag-Behre (talk) 09:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chirag-Behre. Rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the subject is not notable, so no amount of editing will make the draft acceptable here. You may wish to consider alternative outlets that have different inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:26:20, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre


Amit Ramani (born April 15, 1974) is an Indian entrepreneur who started Awfis Space Solutions (co-working spaces) in 2015 with 8 centers. Currently Awfis space solutions has centers in 8 cities across India with a total of 34 spaces. Amit Ramani is also the President and Managing Director of NELSON Asia, a leading group in Asia providing design and real estate consulting services.

Education

Amit Ramani graduated in B. Arch in the year 1994 from School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi, India. He holds a Master’s degree in Architecture (Year 1999) from Kansas University, Manhattan Kansas. Additionally, he also holds a Master’s degree in Science (Year 2001) from Cornell University, Ithaca New York.

Career In the early years of his career, Amit worked as a Business partner with Bank of America. In April 2015, Amit Ramani established Awfis Space Solutions, with investment from The Three Sisters: Institutional Office, a family-run investment firm managed by Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor’s daughters.

Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:30:38, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre


May I know why it has not been approved by the Wikipedia team? What are the further steps I need to take further. Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:35:36, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75


Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:02:56, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Rbiddis1


I'd like to be able to edit my wiki page and have it reviewed again. I have re-written the article to focus solely on Troublemaker (Band). I have also added several more references and items to show notability of the band. Please advise on how to move forward with my project. Thanks for your time and your help.

Rbiddis1 (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:40:57, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Laura.vepraskas


Hi! I believe it has been 8 weeks since my last submission. Is there anything my team can do to help move the review process forward. Happy to help in any way I can. Thanl you! Laura.vepraskas (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:06:23, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Parinthacker


The page that I have requested for creation was rejected. I have since then made appropriate changes to bring it in line with Wikipedia policies and standards. The submission is pending for more than 2 months now. Can I please get some help in this matter?

Parinthacker (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=914978832"