Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JJMC89 (talk | contribs) at 06:17, 6 July 2019 (→Template:Re-Volts: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
< June 27 June 29 >

June 28

Template:Calendar/TFD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage of {{Calendar}} that was never utilized that was intended to be utilized for Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cs1 function

In Citation Style 1 templates, the parameters subscription= and registration= are deprecated. Since the nominated template is only used on documentation for templates that transclude {{Subscription required}} or {{Registration required}}, this purpose of template is deprecated and following the directions in this template are now inaccurate since using the subscription= or registration= parameters in Citation Style 1 templates now returns a red warning message stating that the aforementioned parameters are now deprecated. Steel1943 (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why shouldn't the text be changed in those transclusions that show deprecated parameters?

for {{subscription required}}:
change from:
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|subscription|yes}} and {{para|via}}}}
to
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|url-access|subscription}} and {{para|via}}}}
for {{registration required}}:
change from:
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|registration|yes}} and {{para|via}}}}
to
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|url-access|registration}} and {{para|via}}}}
for {{HighBeam}} – remove {{cs1 function}} from the doc page; as an aside, {{HighBeam}} should probably be the subject of some discussion somewhere because HighBeam is apparently defunct; where it is used, {{HighBeam}} is often coupled with a link to an archive of HighBeam's teaser page (a paragraph or maybe two from the source but no way to see the rest)
for {{InfoTrac}} (another template that perhaps deserves discussion because not used anywhere) modify the {{cs1 function}} transclusion on the doc page as described for {{subscription required}}
for {{Subscription or libraries}}, delete (because cs1|2 has never supported the 'libraries' component of that template; or, change:
from
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|subscription|yes}} and {{para|via}}}}
to
{{cs1 function|by use of {{para|via}}}}

—Trappist the monk (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:African Union

Propose merging Template:African Union with Template:Life in the African Union.
The contents in Life in African Union can to fit in African Union Template and more to it.Manabimasu (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clone in vertical form and expand - template:African Union is a horizontal footer template, and there needs to be a vertical template equivalent. Change name to template:African Union sidebox or similar -ApexUnderground (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedway in Poland navboxes

Propose merging Template:Team Speedway Polish Championship seasons, Template:Polish speedway teams, Template:Speedway Ekstraliga and Template:Speedway Ekstraliga seasons with Template:Speedway in Poland.
Procedural nomination on behalf of User:Abcmaxx who posted this at WP:PM with the following rationale: "It is essentially the same template and would be more beneficial to have just the one." Trialpears (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Charlotte 49ers softball coach navbox

Also propose deleting-

Navbox with just one or two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ridel High

The band's navigational template consists of five links: the band's article, three member articles and a member redirect to a different band that already link between themselves making this template unnecessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Re-Volts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of three links: the band's article and two member articles that already link between themselves making this template unnecessary and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Confucius Peace Prize

A trivial template that fails WP:NAVBOX guidelines; basically nobody has actually accepted this prize, it's solely the pronouncements of one insignificant group. Only transcluded on one page now (disclaimer: after I removed it from some of the "winners"). Originally created by a now-banned editor. See also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_21#Category:Confucius_Peace_Prize . SnowFire (talk) 21:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and use. It actually does not fail the guidelines and is in fact an accepted practice to have a navigation template for winners of an award notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. See {{Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture}} as an example of an award that no one (or mostly no one) "accepted" and yet it has an article, a nav template and is placed on all articles. I have no idea how notable the Confucius Peace Prize is, but if you think it isn't, then nominate it at AfD and if it gets deleted, this will follow. --Gonnym (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gonnym: It's notable enough for an article, but its notability is not exactly as a prize if that makes any sense. I suggest you read the main article. The Confucius Peace Prize was notable as a reaction to the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobao and the "empty chair" and all, that China might set up a rival prize and was unhappy with the result there. Basically every "prize" post-2010 was a non-notable continuation that, to the extent it received any coverage, was considered a "news of the weird" ha-ha type thing. The Golden Raspberries... okay, to be honest, I think that template is borderline too, but the Golden Raspberries are very notable and legitimately are mentioned in retrospectives on movies, and they're also the kind of award you'd expect people not to accept. That's not the case here; this award is far less notable than the Raspberries (absolutely nobody will write a retrospective on Fidel Castro saying he won this award at age 88, by which we mean a statue was handed to a random Cuban student in China. I am not making that up. [1]) Basically, "has an article" is not a good standard here, this is closer to a political party that won a few seats in 2010 and still technically exists, but gets <1% of the vote ever since, they shouldn't have their later pronouncements subsisting on the fumes of legitimate older notability from 2010. SnowFire (talk) 14:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2017 Campeonato Paulista Group A

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_28&oldid=905014057"