Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 July 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gonnym (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 1 July 2019 (Template:Political groups of the European Parliament (6th)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

July 1

Unused template. Not used at Political groups of the European Parliament, which uses {{European Parliament standings (6th)}} instead. Gonnym (talk) 17:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused at 2006 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC)#Goalscorers. Gonnym (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A simple template that is used on one page. No reason for this to be a template and should be subst in the article and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 17:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 17:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. File:TE-Nervous system diagram.svg seems to have replaced it. Gonnym (talk) 17:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 17:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged (with attribution) with the parent article per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 13:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never seen ahnentafels in footer navboxes like that before. Better transform into a Template:Ahnentafel conventional in article format in "Ancestry" section. See also previous merge proposal: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 7. PPEMES (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never seen ahnentafels in footer navboxes like that before. Better transform into a Template:Ahnentafel conventional in article format in "Ancestry" section. See also previous merge proposal: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 7. PPEMES (talk) 09:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Partisan sources with Template:Third-party.
The problem with partisan sources is that they are not independent of the subject, but not bias (as WP:BIASED does not prohibit sources with an agenda). And what's the difference between a clear and a pronounced agenda? wumbolo ^^^ 23:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]