Talk:Open Location Code
![]() | Maps Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Google Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Possible COPYVIO
Most of the lead looks like it may have been copied from [1] Nyth63 16:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- That link was published several years later than the WP article. −Woodstone (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Grammar
The sentence In the code, each time one digit of latitude and one of longitude alternate. does not parse well. I think it means that the code digits alternate between latitude and longitude. There may be a comma or word missing but I did not want to edit it and change the meaning. Nyth63 17:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The other "right"?
The last paragraph of the example reads "The next step takes the rightmost block on the second row from the bottom in this block: 6PH57VP3+PR6." If this refers to the table above, the "6" is in the *leftmost* column, correct? FBitterlich (talk) 10:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed. I corrected the location based on newer and more clear Google satellite images and forgot to update the explanation. The location jumped over the border between blocks. −Woodstone (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Cabo Verde
Just for reference related to the "Google states that" element: you can check the active usage on the Cabo Verde postal website, and when I was talking lately with cleaners from Cabo Verde in the Netherlands they were amazed that I knew about this: it's really a live changer for them there. LaPingvino (talk) 14:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Plus one character codes
The website https://plus.codes does allow the codes like GV2G+ and GV2G+75, but does not allow GV2G+7. Currently the article looks as if they are okay. Is there some official rule that discourages them? Hellerick (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- The article states "the code begins with up to five pairs of digits" and "after 8 digits, a plus sign (+) is inserted in the code". In the discussed code there are 9 digits (not counting the inserted +), forming 4 pairs and a dangling digit 7, making it an invalid code. −Woodstone (talk) 06:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
decimalisation
The use of base-20 is a pain. Let's just use decimal to describe numbered rectangles starting where the international date line meets the south pole. Can Google Zurich do a conversion app?