Jump to content

Talk:Open Location Code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 217.44.109.196 (talk) at 12:10, 25 June 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMaps Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGoogle Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Possible COPYVIO

Most of the lead looks like it may have been copied from [1] Nyth63 16:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That link was published several years later than the WP article. −Woodstone (talk) 19:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

The sentence In the code, each time one digit of latitude and one of longitude alternate. does not parse well. I think it means that the code digits alternate between latitude and longitude. There may be a comma or word missing but I did not want to edit it and change the meaning. Nyth63 17:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The other "right"?

The last paragraph of the example reads "The next step takes the rightmost block on the second row from the bottom in this block: 6PH57VP3+PR6." If this refers to the table above, the "6" is in the *leftmost* column, correct? FBitterlich (talk) 10:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. I corrected the location based on newer and more clear Google satellite images and forgot to update the explanation. The location jumped over the border between blocks. −Woodstone (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cabo Verde

Just for reference related to the "Google states that" element: you can check the active usage on the Cabo Verde postal website, and when I was talking lately with cleaners from Cabo Verde in the Netherlands they were amazed that I knew about this: it's really a live changer for them there. LaPingvino (talk) 14:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plus one character codes

The website https://plus.codes does allow the codes like GV2G+ and GV2G+75, but does not allow GV2G+7. Currently the article looks as if they are okay. Is there some official rule that discourages them? Hellerick (talk) 04:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "the code begins with up to five pairs of digits" and "after 8 digits, a plus sign (+) is inserted in the code". In the discussed code there are 9 digits (not counting the inserted +), forming 4 pairs and a dangling digit 7, making it an invalid code. −Woodstone (talk) 06:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

decimalisation

The use of base-20 is a pain. Let's just use decimal to describe numbered rectangles starting where the international date line meets the south pole. Can Google Zurich do a conversion app?