User talk:207.200.116.139

This IP address was that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL.
If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.

July 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Deuterocanonical books on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~ Butros (Talk) 23:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

Your edit to Michael Moore

Your recent edit to Michael Moore (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S.V.C

S.V.C a rap group from san jose,ca contains two members Cap'N'Skippa and Iceman X — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.116.195 (talk • contribs) 02:53, August 27, 2006 (UTC)

September 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to July 10 in rail transport, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Slambo (Speak) 01:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sep 17th

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Your edit to 2001 Mars Odyssey

Your recent edit to 2001 Mars Odyssey (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

I have just reverted your vandalism to Wikipedia and I am warning you to stop this behavior now. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly. You may continue editing, but unless all future edits are constructive you will be blocked without further warning. --Bhadani 03:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Arianism

Your recent edit to Arianism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK YOU!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.116.195 (talk • contribs) 20:47, November 1, 2006 (UTC)

Protecting Brian Quintana

Just to let you know, adding {{sprotected}} or {{protected}} to a page is only a means for an admin to notify users that a page is protected. This does not actually confer protection to the article such as the notice you placed on Brian Quintana. If you need help protecting a page, please contact an admin or request it. Thanks! --Geniac 00:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Quintana. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac 12:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Chlorine

Your recent edit to Chlorine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of people speculated to have been syphilitic

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of people speculated to have been syphilitic, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Geniac 06:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Howard Springs Nature Park

Your recent edit to Howard Springs Nature Park (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:20, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shut Down Time for this Account!

This number appears to be a constant, recent source of petty vandalism and needs to by shut down of a substantial period. Stepp-Wulf 00:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

It's a sharedip, there's probably very little if any coming from the same person--AOL account 00:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gun Hill Road (IRT White Plains Road Line)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Gun Hill Road (IRT White Plains Road Line), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Geniac 13:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 14

Thank you for experimenting with the page Refrigerator on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Crystallina 04:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Chlorine

Your recent edit to Chlorine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Naches, Washington, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 21:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Image:224.jpg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Switchercat ^talk_cont 03:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature Convention

Hi, 207.200.116.139. I've started a little discussion on Talk:Special relativity about the sign convention. We need to form a consensus on the signature, if one isn't already formed. Other articles look to me like they follow the -+++ convention that is predominant in current GR practice. Anyways, I thought you might like to comment. (Also, I encourage you to get a username if you intend to keep editing.) --MOBle 16:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Special relativity

Anon -

You can't run roughshod over this page. A lot of prople have put a lot of work into it. That is not to say that it cannot be improved (and I know that it can be improved). However, you need to have some respect for what has come before, and for this community.

IMO, you are making two bad edits for every good one you do. For example, the $ds^{2}$ business is a nice touch, but the business of the four-velocity always being c is something that will confuse most readers, and belongs in the four velocity article. Another example is your adding "of special relativity" to the statement about how tensors transform. That rule is carried forward into the general theory, so your statement is incorrect.

I am going to revert your edits again, and keep reverting until you start using the talk page so that we work with to create appropriate edits. Being bold is a tenet of Wikipedia, but that is not a liscence to be reckless. --EMS | Talk 17:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SR edits

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --EMS | Talk 17:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on November 20 2006 to Special relativity

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

William M. Connolley 18:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.