Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchical software models

Hierarchical software models

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this as a "one sentence stub definition", which was declined because length is not a reason for deletion. A WP:BEFORE shows little-to-no usage as a term, which fails both WP:GNG and WP:NOT#DICT. DannyS712 (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 00:58, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and subject does not appear to be notable. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 20:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 14:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the use of the phrase in the literature is inconsistent. It is used in other contexts than just quality attributes. I don't see enough reliable sources referencing the title to justify notability. --mikeu ^talk 23:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]