Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hhkohh (talk | contribs) at 06:03, 9 March 2019 (DRVs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

February 23

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same rationale as Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 2#SEPTA style templates. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:String. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 23:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Module:PatternCount with Module:String.
Consolidate string-related module functions under Module:String {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:52, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used for spoken article files, but all of the files have been transferred to Commons, so this template is no longer being used. Also, this template has been superseded by the one on Commons. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:NENAN (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded (WP:NENAN), could be merged with the below nomination but I think both should be deleted DannyS712 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a new award, of the European Handball Federation. We will need both Template:IHF World Player of the Year (men) and Template:IHF World Player of the Year Women (women) like in the case of the IHF World Player of the Year award by the International Handball Federation. It should not be deleted or even merged! As per football also. You just nominate to nominate? Why do you nominate if you know nothing about the organisation on Wikipedia? Christina (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very important award, handball only has 2, IHF World Player of the Year and EHF Player of the Year (basically the European Player of the Year). It's the continental award. On women's handball we also separated templated and a lot more awards like [[1]], [[2]] etc. As a specifically handball editor, I am telling you this nomination is not good. Christina (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:NENAN (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded (WP:NENAN), could be merged with the above nomination but I think both should be deleted DannyS712 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a new award, of the European Handball Federation. We will need both Template:IHF World Player of the Year (men) and Template:IHF World Player of the Year Women (women) like in the case of the IHF World Player of the Year award by the International Handball Federation. It should not be deleted or even merged! As per football also. You just nominate to nominate? Why do you nominate if you know nothing about the organisation on Wikipedia? Christina (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very important award, handball only has 2, IHF World Player of the Year and EHF Player of the Year (basically the European Player of the Year). It's the continental award. On women's handball we also separated templated and a lot more awards like [[3]], [[4]] etc. As a specifically handball editor, I am telling you this nomination is not good. Christina (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 06:43, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Main article doesn't exist, neither should the navbox; only 4 of the 67 links lead to articles that exist. DannyS712 (talk) 05:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. WP:NENAN (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nippon Professional Baseball draft doesn't exist; neither should the navbox. DannyS712 (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The main article will be created shortly and at present this is the only item that allows users to move between draft pages by year, otherwise the url needs to be manually changed. I'd prefer it remains to allow ease of navigation. Cynikles (talk) 23:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It serves as navigation to related wiki pages, i.e., clicking the one-peso coin points to its main article
    Moon Rivers (talk) 11:42 24 February 2019 (UTC +8:00)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It serves as navigation to related wiki pages, i.e., clicking the 20-peso bill points to its main article
    Moon Rivers (talk) 11:42 24 February 2019 (UTC +8:00)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded as a template; subst the one transclusion and then delete DannyS712 (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:03, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:String count. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).