Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Human Interaction Lab

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.198.222.67 (talk) at 19:49, 4 February 2019 (Opinion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Virtual Human Interaction Lab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatently promotional, mostly created by a clear COI account according to https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Virtual_Human_Interaction_Lab and I've today reverted more promotional content. Might be best at the COI board, but wanted to get the opinion of AfD people. A quick search shows it's notable, but I suspect the article should be restarted from scratch. Joe (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I think I've saved this page from WP:TNT, at the very least. It involved cutting out possibly most of the bla bla. I also tried to inline some of the academic (sans url) sources in the references section, but I don't have the patience for that full effort at this point. I wouldn't object if someone else wanted to just delete them. But the page passes GNG, it seems. I'm unsure if it passes WP:CORPDEPTH? I'll do some additional research, although based on Joe's statement, at the very least a partial merge to Stanford might be appropriate. 66.198.222.67 (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]