User talk:Ccmdp

Welcome

Hello, Ccmdp, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! wia (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bush flying. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Regancy42 (talk) 11:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Origamite was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ccmdp/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Origamite^ⓣⓒ 12:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Origamite^ⓣⓒ 12:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bush Air (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bush Air and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bush Air concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bush Air, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bush Air

Hello, Ccmdp. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bush Air".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocking you because a look at your edits has shown that your primary interest here is to add mentions of Bush Air and your book to Wikipedia. It looks extremely likely that you are the book's author or at least someone affiliated with him. The book appears to be self-published or published through an extremely small publisher. I don't see where it's really received enough attention or is considered to be authoritative enough to warrant a mention on Wikipedia. You've repeatedly tried to add it to various articles ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) and I note that at one point you had a very promotional article (with likely WP:COPYVIO) in your sandbox. I am aware that you have never been given an official warning on advertising or promotion (although your sandbox article was declined due to it reading like an advertisement), but this is a bit extreme. It's possible that you may be unblocked, but you would first have to show that you understand the following:

That Wikipedia is not a place to promote your business or your work.
That linking to self-published sources is extremely discouraged, especially if you wrote it yourself.
That you will not link to your business or work on Wikipedia.

Basically, I need to know that you understand that Wikipedia is WP:NOT an advertising front and that you will not attempt to re-add your book as a source to any articles. It just doesn't pass the criteria on Wikipedia for reliable sources and given that you also link to the purchase page for the book, it's pretty unambiguous promotion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A second look shows that you've been doing this since 2009, which doesn't really reflect well considering that at some point you should have had exposure to guidelines about using Wikipedia as a place to promote yourself or using SPS as sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed that your first edit was to add in a link to an airport here and you later replaced that with a link to your company's website. It's just really difficult for me to see this as anything other than self-promotion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ccmdp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi , I hope I can be unblocked after 3 years. I am aware of the reasons for blocking was due to me directing edits for self promotion and did not pay attention to the conditions prior to doing so. I have now read the guidlines and conditions now and will not do it again! Thanks.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi , I hope I can be unblocked after 3 years. I am aware of the reasons for blocking was due to me directing edits for self promotion and did not pay attention to the conditions prior to doing so. I have now read the guidlines and conditions now and will not do it again! Thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi , I hope I can be unblocked after 3 years. I am aware of the reasons for blocking was due to me directing edits for self promotion and did not pay attention to the conditions prior to doing so. I have now read the guidlines and conditions now and will not do it again! Thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi , I hope I can be unblocked after 3 years. I am aware of the reasons for blocking was due to me directing edits for self promotion and did not pay attention to the conditions prior to doing so. I have now read the guidlines and conditions now and will not do it again! Thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}