Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNA Model Management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by K.e.coffman (talk | contribs) at 04:55, 6 October 2018 (DNA Model Management: D). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
DNA Model Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet general notability guidelines. Mostly consists of a list of people represented by the firm, for which notability is not inherited would apply. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How is this agency any different from any other agency that has a Wikipedia article? Look at the page for IMG Models for example. How is THAT more notable than this? It also only has 3 references. Lupine453 (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lupine453: Thank you for pointing that out, just created an AfD for it. Also, please see other stuff exists. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:59, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH; a search for source turns up only trivial mentions or mentions in passing, I.E nothing in depth that is actually concerned with the company. The nom is absolutely correct to point out WP:NOTINHERITED, as in the case DNA Model Management does not inherit notability from notable people it has worked with in the past.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:07, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:07, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]