Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globex Trading System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Northamerica1000 (talk | contribs) at 00:17, 30 September 2018 (Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Globex Trading System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Most of the refs are from a single Wiki which is not reliable and only one other source. Contentious text sourced to its own web-site has been removed. Previously speedily deleted on 8th September  Velella  Velella Talk   19:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Obviously notable. While CME essentially has become Globex, this took a long time - and for two+ decades Globex ran concurrent to the pits with different contract sizes. In any event - this is the system on which most of the future contracts, worldwide by volume, are traded. Even a cursory google books search for "Globex", shows notability. Icewhiz (talk) 17:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Globex was set up in 1992 by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and provides an electronic trading platform for futures and option contracts. I think there is no doubt that it meets our notability criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Chicago Mercantile Exchange#Electronic trading, lots of passing mention, where is the substantive coverage. Important yes, but that doesn't make for notability. Stick with section in the CME article. --Bejnar (talk) 03:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]