Talk:Comparison of continuous integration software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

New features

This chart should also contain whether it uses a distributed agent model. -- 159.53.46.142

Structure

Maybe the C/C++ builders column can be dropped? Anyone else supporting such change? --Kslotte (talk) 10:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems strange to have separate columns for "Windows builders" and "Java builders" (both terms that I (a software developer) haven't come across anywhere else). If you ask me, in a CI context, a "builder" would be something with which the CI could communicate, i.e. start it and then interpret the results (be it through an API or by parsing a log). Therefore, I suggest making a second table with a column for each builder (that at least a couple of CIs support), e.g. one for GNU Make, one for Apache Ant, one for Apache Maven, etc. The ability to run a command or script could have its own column. And possibly a last column for "others". --LeBoef (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add testing capabilities

These are even more important than build ones 'cuz building is a straightforward and simple process.

I consider the following categories:

Unit test integration;
Integration/System (UI, database) test integration;
Test management capabilities/integration;
Test environment management capabilities/integration.

— Vano 22:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New CI Tool based on PowerShell

There is a new CI Tool based on PowerShell: http://www.crawler-lib.net/build-tools 84.171.111.227 (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

The list on continuous integration was deleted. All items there are here except:

BuildHive
Cascade (software)
CruiseControl.rb
FinalBuilder Server: VSoft Technologies proprietary automated build and continuous integration server.
IBM Rational Team Concert: proprietary software development collaboration platform with built-in build engine.
IBM Rational Software SCLM: software configuration management system for z/OS.
Xcode 5 also contains a proprietary continuous integration system, works closely with OS X Server for OS X Mavericks.

-- Beland (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to the "Comparison of continuous integration software" page

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at D. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Hello, My name is Patricia Wagner and I work at Microsoft as a content publisher for Visual Studio, Team Foundation Server, and Visual Studio Team Services documentation. My team (you might already know Doug Erickson) is reviewing Wikipedia articles that reference our products and services to make sure that they represent the current state and features of our products. Here's a brief description of our proposed changes: In the "Comparison of continuous integration software" table:

In the first row, replace "Unknown" with up-to-date information
Add a new row for "Visual Studio Team Services"

In the "SCM system support" table:

Update the Team Foundation Server row to replace some cells that contain "no" with correct information and add "Visual Studio Team Services."

Please review the changes below and let me know if they are acceptable to you. Thank you very much for your consideration.

Name	Platform	License	Windows builders	Java Builders	Other builders	Notification	IDE Integration	Other integration
Team Foundation Server]	Microsoft Windows]	Proprietary]	MSBuild]	Ant, Maven]	Android iOS Xcode[Script][[1]]	[[2]] [REST API	[Studio] [[3]][or any IDE or editor]	Wide range through build tasks and extensions.IntelliJ

Name	Platform	License	Windows builders	Java Builders	Other builders	Notification	IDE Integration	Other integration
Visual Studio Team Services	[[4]]	Proprietary]	MSBuild]	Ant, Maven]	Android iOS Xcode[Script][[5]]	[[6]] [REST API	[Studio] [[7]][or any IDE or editor]	Wide range through build tasks and extensions.IntelliJ

SCM system support table, Team Foundation Server row:

- First cell : Team Foundation Server & Visual Studio Team Services
- CA Harvest cell:Sync with Tasktop Sync - <ref>http://www.tasktop.com/tasktop-sync<ref>
- CVS cell: Yes with Team Foundation Server Integration Tools: <ref>https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/eb77e739-c98c-4e36-9ead-fa115b27fefe<ref>
- Perforce cell: Migrate with solution provider <ref>http://www.aitgmbh.de/en/services/tfs-vs-consulting/our-offer/configuration-migration-and-customization/perforce-migration.html<ref>
- Star Team cell: Sync with Tasktop Sync - <ref>http://www.timelymigration.com/starteam-to-tfs.aspx<ref>
- Subversion cell: Sync with Tasktop Sync - <ref>http://timelymigration.com/svn-to-tfs.aspx<ref>
- Team Concert cell: No	Yes with adapter: Kovair Omnibus Integration Adapter/ Connector for IBM Rational Team Concert - <ref>https://www-304.ibm.com/partnerworld/gsd/w3solutiondetails.do?solutionId=49118&lc=en&state=P<ref>
- Visual SourceSafe cell: Upgrade/migrate data <ref>https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms253090.aspx<ref>

Hi there. The request is outdated, so I'll have to deny it because of that, and because none of the involved editors seemed to comment on the proposal. Regards, VB00 (talk) 05:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing CI Systems

The following popular CIs should also be added to the list:

https://www.bitrise.io
https://nevercode.io/
https://probo.ci/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.140.196.74 (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services have a new Build-Agent for multiple platforms: https://github.com/Microsoft/vsts-agent

-- WikiWriter123 (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitrise is quite good, and can be used for any type of project, but it appears to focus on Mobile apps. I've tested it with a few projects, mobile and non-mobile.

Nevercode CI/CD is for mobile apps only. Nevercode integrates effortlessly with iOS, Android, Ionic, Cordova, React Native and Flutter apps.

Just noting however that neither have many results in Google News archive; are they popular? The other services on this page also dont have many Google News archive hits, so how do we choose which ones should be listed here...? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 10:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose restructure - separate table for build processes

As has been commented above, the "builders" sections are a bit weird. I propose creating a separate build process table with a list of headers for all the standard build processe (gradle/maven/ant/nant etc. - in alphabetical order) and simple yes/part/no answers in each case. At the same time the main comparison table would be expanded a little to include first release / latest release / hosted (yes/no) / platform(s) - independent of hosted / license / homepage (link) StacksofHoy (talk) 07:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in favor of that. Pianoman320 (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]