Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.NET Framework version history
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- .NET Framework version history (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTCHANGELOG. Fails WP:LISTN. A very tiny part of the sources are independent, and those verify only one or two versions. wumbolo ^^^ 10:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I really don't see a good enough reason to delete this, it's a decent resource article on wiki. I think the nominator would need to explain further his thoughts for this AfD. Govvy (talk) 11:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep While each AfD stands on its own merits given the comment per Grovvy and therefore high risk of WP:BEFORE and given other AfD's, prods, and speedys raised by nom at a similar time with insufficient thought to merges this risks more chance of good faith (albeit a mix of good, bad and ugly) simply being binned. If there is a run of good 'delete' or 'merge' suggestions I'm open to review this comment.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not going to merge something covered by WP:NOT if it is not notable. wumbolo ^^^ 10:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)