Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ming Sherap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sorry, LuckyRacerNP, but "notability is well known in YouTube, Instagram etc." is not enough to meet WP:N; pretty much everybody can easily enlist a song "in internet". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ming Sherap

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because this article is about the youtuber who has enlisted his song in internet and his notability is well known in YouTube, Instagram etc.LuckyRacerNP (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've redirect the newly created article on his song Swag Kta Moh to Ming Sherap; I don't see how the song can be notable if he isn't. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:32, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some trivial coverage, fails WP:GNG, WP:WEB. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested}

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for better consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88^(talk) 17:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only source is region-biased and seems to be more of a fluff piece. --QEDK (後 ☕ 桜) 06:23, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.