Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DHTMLX

DHTMLX

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

DHTMLX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources. — Newslinger talk 14:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 14:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

• Weak delete. So, there's a book about this library, for some reason, but Packt, the publisher, is a print-on-demand press and so it's an SPS. I got a fair number of Google Scholar hits, but none provide significant coverage, and I can't see how a verifiable article could be assembled from them. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)