Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wagile software development
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wagile software development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Violates WP:NEO. Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Not to be confused with Agile software development. — Newslinger talk 13:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 13:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 13:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 13:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 13:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed with the proposer, Newslinger. This is a neologism that combines the Waterfall model of software development with Agile software development but it is not in widespread use and never really caught on, failing WP:NEO. It only seems to be mentioned on a very small number of websites, mostly just blogs, none of which would be considered reliable, independent sources, failing WP:GNG. And the capitalization isn't even standardized, some sources capitalize it as "WAgile" instead of "Wagile". As a programmer myself, I had never heard of "Wagile" software development before seeing this AfD nomination, and while combining aspects of the Waterfall model with Agile software development is a useful idea for software development, this neologism never really caught on for describing that idea so I can't see any justification to keep the article. If there WERE anything useful in this article I would propose merging it into Agile software development but this article is just a stub with nothing useful in it, just throw it away, don't bother merging. Yetisyny (talk) 14:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)