Talk:Fault coverage

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Two different topics in one page

Fault coverage and test coverage are not identical concepts.

Moreover, it is strange to have test coverage introduced as a subsection of fault coverage given that it is more general and more popular than fault coverage (Google: 915 000 entries for "test coverage" vs 355 000 entries for "fault coverage"). Logically, the two pages should be permuted: test coverage should be the main one and fault coverage should redirect to it.

Vasywriter (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ugh - yes. See comment below as well. CodeCurmudgeon (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also code coverage

There is an article for code coverage where it incorrectly equates "test coverage" to "code coverage" so there is definitely a need to clean up this area around "software testing coverage" CodeCurmudgeon (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]