Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucid9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Democratics (talk | contribs) at 08:18, 4 February 2018 (→Lucid9: expanded my explanation on my vote). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Lucid9

Lucid9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game that fails WP:GNG. The cited references seem to essentially be blogs rather than reliable sources with editors. There were some mentions on Siliconera and Hardcore Gamer, but they were not significant. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 03:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree, the cited references do not appear to be notable/reliable. I checked on GameFAQs and Mobygames for better sources. GameFAQs has no reviews listed for the game, not even reader reviews, and Mobygames has no entry for the game at all. Lucid9 is a free-to-play fangame, so the lack of coverage is not too surprising, but it just doesn't seem to meet notability requirements.--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The first two review sites appear to have editors, but are minor at best. The third is probably not usable as an RS, but the article shades past just how scathing the review is. No significant RS coverage found elsewhere of 2014-2016+ development or 2016 release. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 05:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics Talk 08:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:BLOGS. Unreliable sources have minor editors, rather, fans' reviews. This proves the article's section on its critical reception to be questionable, as this game isn't heard of in many gaming (JP visual novels for this case) websites. Not of any significance, also fails WP:NRV. Currently reviewing it whether it passes WP:NTEMP, however I don't see any sign it has gained recognizable notability in any given point in time. Your welcome | Democratics Talk 08:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lucid9&oldid=823930205"