Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mortee (talk | contribs) at 02:47, 18 January 2018 (→Teahouse invitation wording: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Welcome to the Wikipedia Articles for Creation Helper script support page
WPAFC talk pages: Main - AFC Helper script - Reviewer help
AfC submissions
Random submission
3+ months
3,163 pending submissions
Purge to update
Shortcut


Skip to the bottom
WikiProject iconArticles for creation Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is used for the administration of the Articles for Creation or Files for Upload processes and is therefore within the scope of WikiProject Articles for Creation. Please direct any queries to the discussion page.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creation (admin)AfC projectWikiProject icon
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.



    script complaining im not listed

    the script keeps saying that im not listed at participants (which I am, i checked.), and won't run. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 17:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Another capitalization issue. @Primefac: just need to change the capitalization to Aunva6 not aunva6. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Aunva6, I take it that you're interested in becoming active again? Primefac (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    yes. i actually tracked down the bit of code that's causing it, as the script is case sensitive. probably easier to use an editnotice or hat to tell adding admins to ensure capitalization is correct. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Since that's "me", I will make a note (and I've already fixed a few others on the list). Primefac (talk) 18:32, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Categories

    Apparently, the "Add categories" box now only lists categories that are already listed in the draft. For example, for Draft:Avant Festival, only 4 categories are allowed in the categories box and any other category name will just display "No results match Foo" regardless of whether the categories actually exist or not. Is there a recent change somewhere in the code that causes this to occur? Is this intentional, or is this a bug that should be reverted? PrimeHunter suggested at WP:VPT#Categories in AFC script that I should post the problem here instead of there. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    This doesn't sound like a script issue, but a lookup issue (I don't think AFCH has even been updated in the last day or so). Enterprisey? Primefac (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Similar for me too.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:06, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Reproduced and investigating. I'm not sure what's causing this right now, but I should have it figured out soonish. Enterprisey (talk!) 21:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, should be fixed. Let me know if there are further issues. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Option for reviewer note upon acceptance?

    There's been a few times where there's a passable draft but there are some next steps I'd like to provide the author to improve the article further. This can be done by the talk page, but it would be super cool if there was a "reviewer note" field to easily provide article feedback before pressing "accept & publish". – by AdA&D at 02:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Where would the feedback go? I guess the article talk page, and the talk page of the creator? Enterprisey (talk!) 03:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I would think on the Talk page. There have been a couple of instances myself where I've been on the fence, and wanted to leave further notes on the talk page (usually saying "I'm okay with AFD for this one"). Obviously there are those will find it useful, but it also becomes a question of effort-to-return; is it easier for the devs to implement this extra suggestion, or easier for the reviewer to just go to the talk page? As I'm not one of them I cannot say which holds more sway. Primefac (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd also find it reasonably useful; yeah to say when I'm 50-50 on something or something like that. Galobtter (pingó mió) 03:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    A talk page note would be pretty easy. I'm busy right now getting stuff together for Wikipedia Day, but after that I should be free to get this done. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Addition of CSD

    Similar to the 'cv - Submission is a copyright violation' dropdown selection, where there is a checkbox for 'Nominate the submission for speedy deletion', could there be the same checkbox for 'adv - submission reads like an advertisement'. I've lost count the number of times I've has to also nominate the submission for deletion. Thank you David.moreno72 06:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Completely Support. It would be a very valuable addition. KJP1 (talk) 16:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Just for clarity - this would be a nomination as G11, yes? Primefac (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, a G11 nomination. David.moreno72 01:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk page headers

    Would it be possible for the script to automatically add the {{talk header}} when a draft is accepted?SeraphWiki (talk) 08:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Teahouse invitation wording

    The Teahouse invitation that the tool adds begins "Hello! User, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing." That looks odd – and a bit sarcastic – when it comes from the same person who declined the article. Could we change that to something like "Hello User! I know that having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing."? Mortee (talk) 02:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Helper_script&oldid=821043649"