This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on December 25, 2017. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{Copy edit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Merge proposal
Merger?
This has been on the table since May, unless someone makes a compelling case otherwise I will merge it in a week's time. --Eralam (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose life has happened, since I'm still able to do this 11 days later. More seriously, have a look at my thoughts on some of the other articles in the series (I discuss this in a post, here). It is in the process of differentiation, and I think it unfair to just lump everything in to one article. Surely, comp phys would need to be differentiated from sci comp in general. Some things are just more relevant to physics (or astrophysics, for that matter) than say, mathematics. That is why we need this article. Ema--or (talk) 00:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
