Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure input and output handling
- Secure input and output handling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced "How-to" essay tagged since 2013 Staszek Lem (talk) 21:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, that's an essay/how-to guide. A redirect to data validation is worth considering; I would weakly oppose it, because it is not exactly the same topic, but avoiding broken external links is a worthy goal. TigraanClick here to contact me 17:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- A correct redirect would be a generic one to Computer security, since the discussed title is as generic as it may be; after all, "input and output" is 66%, while 33% is "process the data" :-). Staszek Lem (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well, that looks like an overbroad redirect (not sure "overbroad" is the correct term here?). We would not redirect Unnotablia Subsubsubspecia to Animal. If anything, that is an argument against redirecting at all. TigraanClick here to contact me 08:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- A correct redirect would be a generic one to Computer security, since the discussed title is as generic as it may be; after all, "input and output" is 66%, while 33% is "process the data" :-). Staszek Lem (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)