Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UpCodes
Appearance
- UpCodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A directory-like entry on a private company that launched in 2016. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is PR-driven material based on WP:SPIP sources such as: "Q&A: UpCodes co-founder Scott Reynolds on a new way to look at ... Construction Dive-Aug 23, 2017". WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:06, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Besides the Construction Dive article which does seem to be a WP:SPIP source, there's 5 other seemingly quality sources that are independent from the company: TechCrunch, YCombinator, Curbed (owned by Vox Media), American Institute of Architects and ArchDaily.
- In addition, there are many similar articles of companies in a similar space (and maybe other spaces, but I'm most familiar with construction-tech these days). Examples include Fieldwire, PlanGrid, FieldLens, Procore and I'm sure there's a lot more. These seem to be of similar encyclopedic content and with a similar amount and quality of citation material. Zephyrus Tavvier (talk) 03:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Disclaimer: I have an affiliation with the company in this article. Zephyrus Tavvier (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)