Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control-left
- Control-left (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems like a neologism, but I found a few uses of the term [1] [2] in sources. menaechmi (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – non-notable neologism, used primarily in blogs. –barakokula31 (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: no indication that the phrase has achieved either mainstream usage or attention from multiple independent reliable sources. Not A10 but definitely just a blog-esque term. DrStrauss talk 20:43, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The new neologism-of-the-moment, found in fringe blogs like Powerline, thedeepstate.com and Lew Rockwell. Not at all suitable or notable for the Wikipedia. TheValeyard (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Textbook WP:NEOlogism. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete this is not urban dictionary. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: I could not find any use of this term outside blogs or minor media sources; as such fails WP:GNG --Hazarasp (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No coverage outside of fringe political blogs. Zero in-depth coverage to satisfy notability requirements. AusLondonder (talk) 14:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Non notable and mostly invented. Volunteer Marek 23:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)