Talk:False nearest neighbor algorithm

Statistics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Reputable uses

Early on Monday, July 17, 2017, I heard on Bloomberg Radio (Asia/China radio) the use of the term 'false neighbors' in a sense which didn't match this use of the term 'false neighbors'. Is there any other already accepted use of the term?

Might I also ask, is there a use of the term 'false neighbors' for those who profess to be geographic neighbors but who are not neighbors, as in some more recently-developed social media, such as in opportunistic uses in Nextdoor.com? If governments know (through census methods), why aren't we offered an article in Wikipedia about how we could describe our nearest next door neighbors? MaynardClark (talk) 04:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]