Module talk:Buffer

Input

@Jackmcbarn and Mr. Stradivarius: Would like some input on this module, mostly on regarding the documentation and whether anything is unclear. It is a spinoff from code developed for Module:Asbox, which now uses this (so avoid commenting directly in code, or at least make in-code comments in sandbox to avoid job queue flooding). There shouldn't be any bugs other than those noted in the documentation. Also, you guys should also probably edit protect this for template editors. —CodeHydro 15:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This may take a while to take in. I'll come back to this when I have an hour or two to spare and a nice, strong coffee. :) — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 16:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

54.163.11.138 (talk) 03:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PERF

Why exactly is the documentation here making recommendations that ignore WP:PERF? Aiming to improve module performance on individual pages is fine, since all modules on a page share the same execution time limit, but worrying about the cumulative effects on the servers of a minor syntactic difference applied to hundreds of thousands of pages just reeks of blatantly and flippantly ignoring both the spirit and the letter of WP:PERF. Of particular relevance is the section WP:PERF#Editors still have a role to play, and especially the line "Worry about performance if you can tell the difference yourself." (Note that I am not suggesting the module itself should be recoded, only that the documentation should be rewritten to not tell people to worry about the impacts of their coding choices when said impacts are only detectable when measured across thousands of pages.) 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 22:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and made the necessary changes to the documentation since over a month has passed with no comment here. It's worth noting, though, that I may have missed some statements, and to comment more generally, it feels to me reading through the documentation, like a lot of it would benefit from a rewrite. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{? · ☎ Dinoguy1000} 12:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 7 February 2017

It is requested that an edit be made to the template-protected module at Module:Buffer.
(edit · history · last · links · sandbox · edit sandbox · sandbox history · sandbox last edit · sandbox diff · transclusion count · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.

Edit requests to template-protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. Consider making changes first to the module's sandbox before submitting an edit request. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

105.172.3.67 (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]