Jump to content

Talk:Fault coverage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christian75 (talk | contribs) at 11:40, 22 December 2016 (Assessment: +Engineering (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconEngineering Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Two different topics in one page

Fault coverage and test coverage are not identical concepts.

Moreover, it is strange to have test coverage introduced as a subsection of fault coverage given that it is more general and more popular than fault coverage (Google: 915 000 entries for "test coverage" vs 355 000 entries for "fault coverage"). Logically, the two pages should be permuted: test coverage should be the main one and fault coverage should redirect to it.

Vasywriter (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]