Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BackSlash Linux
- BackSlash Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. None of the third-party sources mention the distro, even in passing. Aoidh (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Appears to be the author's own software. Hairhorn (talk) 02:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Not even a single independent source (official website is a free, cu.cc domain). Fails WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 03:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Zero coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 03:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable vanity distro. No coverage whatsoever in any independent sources, reliable or otherwise. Kolbasz (talk) 10:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I've never used Linux, but I can tell that virtually all in the 12 pages of ghits for "BackSlash Linux" are concerned with the use of special characters in Linux as a whole. The three exceptions I can remember were this article, an official site, and sourceforge (download site). May be notable someday. Definitely doesn't look to be yet. BTW I've deleted a version of the article in Hindi under A10. Peridon (talk) 12:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: there is a high level of IP vandalism in this AFD, the most recent of which I've reverted. Note, though, that there was also a merge vote mixed in with the vandalism. Hairhorn (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete-No coverage at all in indepedent reliable sources except one/two.Vanity article.Aru@baska❯❯❯ Vanguard 18:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)