Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proxy based assertion

Proxy based assertion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG. This was a straight paste of an OWASP article by its author, referenced only by the author's own writing on the subject. I can find no other mention of the technique online. I've cleaned it up a bit, but the whole article is WP:Original research, and mostly an unreferenced bulleted list.

OnionRing (talk) 10:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 10:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's because it's the first write-up on the subject. feel free to remove the page if you wish. Ekalman (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please note that once the technique becomes widely used, an article should certainly be written on it. OnionRing (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unreferenced, does not meet notability guideline. DeVerm (talk) 21:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Does not meet WP:N at all, and the author has stated herein that the concept is essentially WP:MADEUP. This is pretty much confirmed upon viewing the sources used in the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I found zero sources. Maybe even speedy delete per WP:G7, though I am not sure the comment above amounts to a "request" of deletion. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 13:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]