Talk:I Won't Say (I'm in Love)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I Won't Say (I'm in Love) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | I Won't Say (I'm in Love) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Disneymania 3.jpg

Image:Disneymania 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:I Won't Say (I'm in Love)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 03:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Infobox
- You can remove the following unnecessary infobox parameters:
- "Cover"
- "Alt"
- "Caption"
- Unlink "Alan Menken" from the "Producer" parameter since you already linked him above in the "Writer" parameter
Lead
Paragraph 1
- Since Cheryl Freeman is the only other credited musician as the artist(s) of the song, I would list her first after "while singers..."
Paragraph 2
- The correct wording is "Motown", not "Mowtown"
- Done. Can't believe I made that mistake hahahaha, how embarrassing.--Changedforbetter (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Paragraph 3
- Link "music critics" to the article "Music journalism" please
Background and context
Paragraph 1
- Remove the extra space after "literal" please
- That last sentence is way long; perhaps you could remove "featuring lyrics that Meg herself would never have sung," for the same effect?
Paragraph 2
- Again, since Cheryl Freeman is the only other credited musician as the artist(s) of the song, I would list her first after "Familiar with..."
- Add "musicians" after "Familiar with" please
- Done, but substituted "musicians" for "singers"; hope that's okay.
Paragraph 3
- American English: Change "realisation" --> "realization"
- Done.
Music and lyrics
Paragraph 2
- The link to "Parody" through "parodies" is unnecessary; please remove it
- Done, removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Reception
- Link "music critics" and "film critics" here in the lead sentence please to the aforementioned articles
- Done.
- Irving Tan's review is very, very long; please trim here and there
- Done; removed "which has gotten uncomfortably crass and increasingly unsubtle over the years" and "for that swooning female friend in your life..."
- Since the list listed also acts as the title, it would be correct to capitalize the statement as "The Best Ever Disney Songs"
Cover versions
- All good! Great work
- Thanks!
External links
- Alphabetize the categories please; the only ones out of place are "Disney's Hercules" and "Love themes"
End of GA Review:
Very well-written articles with minor issues. Seven days for changes to be made ("on hold"); good luck! Thanks! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC).
- I think I've covered just about everything! Awaiting your verdict :-)--Changedforbetter (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Great work. Thanks again! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 21:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC).
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- GA-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- GA-Class Disney articles
- Mid-importance Disney articles
- GA-Class Disney articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- GA-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- GA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles
- Low-importance R&B and Soul Music articles
- WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles