Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staff and Educational Development Association

Staff and Educational Development Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no evidence that this is a major professional organization, or that its credentials are required for any position. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've had a look at the website and it seems to be a major organisation. Its members include many major UK universities, including the University of Edinburgh and Queen's University Belfast. It's also registered as a UK charity and definitely notable. Worth keeping, but the article requires some work. st170e^talk 01:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Referenced in various books and an awarder of post-nominals. Seems to be a significant and important professional organisation. AusLondonder (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at best as I also concur the current information is still questionable and I see no obvious inherited notability to suggest instantly keeping and improving. Restart if needed when better, SwisterTwister talk 07:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]