Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staff and Educational Development Association
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 22:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Staff and Educational Development Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I see no evidence that this is a major professional organization, or that its credentials are required for any position. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - I've had a look at the website and it seems to be a major organisation. Its members include many major UK universities, including the University of Edinburgh and Queen's University Belfast. It's also registered as a UK charity and definitely notable. Worth keeping, but the article requires some work. st170etalk 01:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Referenced in various books and an awarder of post-nominals. Seems to be a significant and important professional organisation. AusLondonder (talk) 06:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best as I also concur the current information is still questionable and I see no obvious inherited notability to suggest instantly keeping and improving. Restart if needed when better, SwisterTwister talk 07:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.