Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2011/November

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting | Proposals | Archive | 2011
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pegship (talk | contribs) at 19:09, 5 May 2016 (cat, archive tag). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Proposals, November 2011

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

Festival templates by Euro country

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Genre divisions are good for festivals but I also feel we should have these by country.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:52, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Support and speediable as we already have a {{Japan-festival-stub}}. SeveroTC 20:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Support - why not? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Germany-theatre-stub}} and Category:German theatre stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Should be over 100.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Support. SeveroTC 20:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Support the category name. Propose new template name: {{Germany-theat-stub}}. See {{theat-stub}}, {{UK-theat-stub}}, {{US-theat-stub}}. Dawynn (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cnidarian stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I was unaware of these proposal procedures when I created two stub categories, {{Anthozoa-stub}} and {{Medusozoa-stub}} (both currently upmerged into {{Cnidarian-stub}}). These stub templates would seem to have been eligible for S1 speedy creation. The current {{Cnidarian-stub}} category covers too much diversity--jellyfish, corals, sea anemones, hydroids.

I am currently reclassifying all {{Cnidarian-stub}} articles into either {{Anthozoa-stub}} or {{Medusozoa-stub}}. Each will each contain 80+ members and many articles have been moved already into the two new sub-stub categories. With a lot of work even these two stub categories would be too broad (Jellyfish and Hydroids, Corals and anemones being the next most likely finer divisions), but for the current articles two stub categories is a big improvement over one. Once all current articles are moved to either {{Anthozoa-stub}} or {{Medusozoa-stub}} then {{Cnidarian-stub}} can be retired. bondolo (talk) 04:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Looks good to me, but if you're looking at further splits, don't forget that the minimum stub category size is usually 60. SeveroTC 20:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories are fully created and are no longer upmerged to parent. Each has 85+ members. About 20 articles in the parent category still need sub-classification. bondolo (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nuclide stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
{{Nuclide-stub}} - create Category:Nuclide stubs 3.14159265358pi (talk)

Is there a permcat for this? I can only find the article (Nuclide). SeveroTC 18:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

3.14159265358pi (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC): What about stub articles like Fluorine-18 or Sodium-24, Severo?

Both of which are in the category tree of Category:Isotopes and are tagged with {{isotope-stub}} (and Category:Isotope stubs is undersized as it is). I don't understand which articles you think this stub type would be useful for as there is no standard category grouping all such articles together. SeveroTC 18:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any use-case for this that is not met already by {{isotope-stub}}. Creating a fork of a small cat into one with a non-distinct meaning apart from the other one does not benefit wikipedia readers or editors. DMacks (talk) 18:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iran Province stub categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some of these may qualify for S1, but here it is:

and change Category:Mazandaran geography stubs to Category:Mazandaran Province geography stubs, to conform.

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Argentine history stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
More specific than Category:Argentina stubs and Category:South American history stubs. Some articles that may use it are the following, from those category, and others from other stub types that may be equally valid in there. There are more than 60 potential stubs to fill the category, without even trying. Cambalachero (talk) 21:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Argentine history stubs
Bit late as I've been on holiday but support template ({{Argentina-hist-stub}}) and a category iff 60. SeveroTC 18:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Support - wondered why it was so quiet around here... --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. I was aware that I could go on when 5 days passed and nobody objected, but just to be sure, I wanted to wait for at least one comment. By tomorrow I will begin creating this, it's a bit late now (23:00 local time) Cambalachero (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Stockholm road stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose to create Category:Stockholm road stubs - {{Stockholm-road-stub}} now has 79 stubs (and probably will have more before I'm done with the current AWB task). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Support (fixed it for you.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Spain rail transport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:Spain rail transport stubs/{{Spain-rail-transport-stub}} - this would hold 2 well-populated stub categories (Category:Spanish rapid transit stubs and Category:Spanish railway station stubs), as well as 28 stubs not currently in either category. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:03, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2011/November&oldid=718807752"