Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux Mathematicorum

Crux Mathematicorum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Journal does not appear to be notable. Could not find non-trivial discussion of it in reliable independent secondary sources. Facebook, Scribd, and references to the journal itself. KDS4444^Talk 06:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I expanded the article with a primary source for its history and a couple of secondary sources. It appears to be the top journal on mathematical problem-solving, so I think it passes WP:NJournal #1 and #3. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with David Eppstein. This is a very special journal, but because it does not publish original research, it will not pop up in the usual places that we use for notability checking. Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]