Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik (programming language)
Appearance
AfDs for this article:
- WP:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming language related/Detail#Beatnik programming language
- WP:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language
- WP:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages#Beatnik programming language
- WP:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language (second nomination)
- WP:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 September 18#Beatnik programming language
- Beatnik (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still just as non-notable as it was the last 5 times it was deleted. Lacks the multiple reliable independent secondary sources discussing the subject in detail needed to establish notability under WP:GNG. Googling turns up (surprise!) nothing. Msnicki (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 09:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:G4 if applicable, simple delete otherwise. While it was not really "deleted 5 times" (check the links), no RS turned up at search for notability. I do not know if the page is "sufficiently identical" to its former version for the CSD to be applicable, but I suspect it is. Tigraan (talk) 10:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)