Talk:Strongly interacting massive particle
![]() | Physics Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Another meaning
SIMP is also an acronym for MITRE's "Simple Instant Messaging and Presence" protocol.
- We don't seem to have an article on that at this time. RJFJR (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Section for review
This section, added by one user in a series of edits, should be reviewed and edited for clarity RJFJR (talk) 02:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
A strongly interactive dark matter is what waves in wave-particle duality in terms of Louis de Broglie's Double Solution Theory.[1]
Non-linear Wave Mechanics: A Causal Interpretation - Louis de Broglie. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1960.
- “Since 1954, when this passage was written, I have come to support wholeheartedly an hypothesis proposed by Bohm and Vigier. According to this hypothesis, the random perturbations to which the particle would be constantly subjected, and which would have the probability of presence in terms of [the wave-function wave], arise from the interaction of the particle with a “subquantic medium” which escapes our observation and is entirely chaotic, and which is everywhere present in what we call “empty space”.”
"The interaction of the particle with a "subquantic medium"" is another way of describing a strongly interactive dark matter. In de Broglie's double solution theory, in a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the strongly interactive dark matter passes through both.
A strongly interactive dark matter medium would be displaced by the particles of matter that exist in it and move through it. This is what de Broglie was referring to when he said, "The interaction of the particle with a "subquantic medium"" .
Aetherdisplacement (talk) 13:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a place for original research. If you believe that strongly interacting DM is the same as de Broglie's subquantic medium, publish your research in a reputable journal, do not deface an encyclopedia. vttoth (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Reference
Reference 12 in "SIMPs annhilations would produce significant heat. DAMA set limits with NaITl crystals.[12]" doesn't seem to support this sentence but instead refers to heat flow in Uranus, which is covered in the next paragraph/sentence which is referenced by [13]. Do we need change the referencing? RJFJR (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)