Talk:Organizational metacognition

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 December 2015 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Business Start‑class

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Suggest a more descriptive title

"List of brain related metaphors in management theory" would be a more appropriate title for this article. --Salimfadhley (talk) 14:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I agree User:Salimfadhley. This is my first attempt at a Wikipedia article, I read all the guidelines but I am struggling to make it as factual and neutral as possible whilst at the same time being a useful resource description for people. I don't know how to change the title, or even if this is something I am able to do, will keep looking. PHCleverley (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Issues Addressed

1. The article was not referenced initially by any other Wikipedia pages. This has been addressed where the less popular (according to the Google n-gram viewer) metaphor of 'corporate amnesia' which has its own page, has been linked the corporate brain page, along with a couple of articles that specifically mention 'corporate brain' in their body text. 2. Notability. Almost 30 verifiable published references have been used to support the use of the metaphors in the literature since the 1930's to present day and how their use has changed. This has been supported by articles from MIT and other peer reviewed tier #1 journals. 3. Essay Style. Significant changes have been made to provide a factual balanced tone to the article. Further suggestions invited. PHCleverley (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 December 2015

((Removed duplicate/obsolete move request → List of brain related metaphors in management theory))

Corporate Brain → Organizational Metacognition – Article under review at present and scheduled for deletion unless changes made. Suggestion from editor to change title from Corporate Brain to a more appropriate descriptive title, List of brain related metaphors in management theory . PHCleverley (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 December 2015

It has been proposed in this section that Organizational metacognition be renamed and moved to Organizational Metacognition.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Corporate Brain → Organizational Metacognition – Original name misleading, page has been completely rewritten. PHCleverley (talk) 07:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References to brain metaphors dropped

The article has been completely rewritten dropping all background material and mentions of 'corporate brain'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PHCleverley (talk • contribs) 07:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New section

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Organizational metacognition. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Examples for the significance of poor organizational metacognition have been published in military[1] and enterprise search environments[2]. [1] http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2007/2755/00/27550190c.pdf [2] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23595/abstract PHCleverley (talk) 11:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]