Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ObjectView
Appearance
- ObjectView (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable commercial software product. Might've been popular two decades ago, but I'm not finding any references that demonstrate notability now. Mikeblas (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete It was marginally notable in the late '90s, but we have nothing here worth keeping. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete until better can be made. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep for now: On the other hand it was one of the first commercial software suites specifically designed for creating and deploying web applications. Ceannlann gorm (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not web applications (broadly), as it was late to that game. If it had any significance, it was as a way to build clients for web services. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)