Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strand sort

Strand sort

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sorting algorithm. Occurs in the DADS, but that's a tertiary source, not a secondary one, and only contains a dictionary definition; the DADS itself refers to a USENET posting. The only other potential source I could find is an arXiv pre-print that refers to this very article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Related: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J sort, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JSort. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This one has more Google scholar hits that are actually relevant than JSort and J sort, but I still didn't find any in-depth coverage in high-quality sources. I don't think it passes WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG (although I agree with David Eppstein that it is more relevant than the two similar articles up for deletion), and does not appear to pass WP:NSOFT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]