Talk:Failure mode and effects analysis
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Examples of worksheet and ranking tables
The example worksheet and ranking tables are unique to ARP476, but many other guidance documents for FMEA use a 10-point scale, or another method entirely, and the layout of the worksheet is often somewhat different. See, for example, the AIAG Potential Failure Mode and Effects manual, the U.S. Army Training Manual 5-698-4 and MIL-STD-1629-A (canceled). Is there any objection to updating the example ranking tables to reflect both standards? Any suggestions on how best to present this without confusing the reader?
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Engineering articles
- High-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles
- C-Class Systems articles
- High-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in project management
- WikiProject Systems articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles