Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Lithuania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rigsofrods (talk | contribs) at 16:02, 18 October 2015 (Listing Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lithuanians_in_France_(2nd_nomination) (delsort.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Lithuania. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Lithuania|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Lithuania. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch


Lithuania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanians in France (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication topic meets WP:GNG. This is one of many "X people in France" articles created by a single editor and their SOCKS. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ghumen. JbhTalk 14:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari Hangout 14:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Rigsofrods (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is based on WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:SYNTH. Are there any RS actually saying this is a significant population? As near as I can tell this is just another article created by a banned SockMaster. JbhTalk 20:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlike the many other "X in France" articles, this one doesn't even cite any sources for the claims it makes (mostly in the infobox), so I suspect it's OR as well as non-notable. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I assessed it. The policy basis for the only keep is not as strong as the unsourced collection of limited info here. The topic may be notable with a more developed article but that is not what we have now. Legacypac (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

WP:PROD nominations