Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inspiration developer

Inspiration developer

Inspiration developer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this is a notable concept. The search "inspiration developer" turns up nothing relevant. The piece is an essay, original research and synthesis from various sources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - This seems to be some sort of promotion of a non-notable business concept in the form of an essay, as evidenced by the use of "we" and the business jargon. Pishcal — ♣ 21:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

• Delete, a mix of original research and a non-notable neologism. Huon (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, OR and neologism Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)